Abstract

In-vehicle information systems (IVIS) refer to a collection of features in vehicles that allow motorists to complete tasks (often unrelated to driving) while operating the vehicle. These systems may interfere, to a greater extent, with older drivers’ ability to attend to the visual and cognitive demands of the driving environment. The current study sought to examine age-related differences in the visual, cognitive and temporal demands associated with IVIS interactions. Older and younger drivers completed a set of common tasks using the IVIS of a representative sample of six different vehicles while they drove along a low-density residential street. Evaluation measures included a Detection Response Task (DRT), to assess both cognitive and visual attention, and subjective measures following each condition using the NASA Task Load Index (TLX). Two age cohorts were evaluated: younger drivers between 21 and 36 years of age, and older drivers between 55 and 75 years of age. Participants completed experimental tasks involving interactions with the IVIS to achieve a specific goal (i.e., using the touch screen to tune the radio to a station; using voice commands to find a specified navigation destination, etc.). Performance of tasks varied according to different modes of interaction available in the vehicles. Older drivers took longer to complete tasks, were slower to react to stimuli, and reported higher task demand when interacting with IVIS. Older drivers stand to benefit the most from advancements in-vehicle technology, but ironically may struggle the most to use them. The results document significant age-related costs in the potential for distraction from IVIS interactions on the road.

Highlights

  • Operating a motor vehicle is one of the riskiest activities that adults engage in on a regular basis

  • Older drivers had difficulty dividing their visual attention between In-Vehicle Information System (IVIS) tasks and the forward roadway

  • Older drivers responded to fewer than 25% of Light-Emitting Diode (LED) illuminations presented on the forward windscreen

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Operating a motor vehicle is one of the riskiest activities that adults engage in on a regular basis. To safely operate a motor vehicle, drivers must maintain their eyes on the forward roadway and keep their mind focused on the drive. This becomes increasingly difficult with the prevalence of in-vehicle electronics. Performing cognitively demanding secondary tasks has been shown to impair each of these “SPIDER-related” processes and increase the relative risk of a crash (Fisher and Strayer, 2014). Another important factor is the visual demand associated with secondary-task interactions. All other things being equal, tasks that takes twice as long to complete will result in twice the potential risk of an adverse event

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call