Abstract

BackgroundThe first evidence that the hazard ratio (HR) for methadone-specific death rises more steeply with age-group than for all drug-related deaths (DRDs) came from Scotland’s cohort of 33,000 methadone-prescription clients. We aim to examine, for England, whether illicit opioid users’ risk of methadone-specific death increases with age; and to pool age-related HRs for methadone-specific deaths with those for Scotland’s methadone-prescription clients. MethodsThe setting is all services in England that provide publicly-funded, structured treatment for illicit opioid users, the methodology linkage of the English National Drug Treatment Monitoring System and mortality database, and key measurements are DRDs, methadone-specific DRDs, or heroin-specific DRDs, by age-group and gender, with proportional hazards adjustment for substances used, injecting status and periods in/out of treatment. ResultsLinkage was achieved for 129,979 adults receiving prescribing treatment modalities for opioid dependence during April 2005 to March 2009 and followed-up for 378,009 person-years (pys).There were 1,266 DRDs: 271 methadone-specific (7 per 10,000 pys: irrespective of gender) and 473 heroin-specific (15 per 10,000 pys for males, 7 for females). Methadone-specific DRD-rate per 10,000 person-years was 3.5 (95% CI: 2.7–4.4) at 18–34 years, 8.9 (CI: 7.3–10.5) at 35–44 years and 18 (CI: 13.8–21.2) at 45+ years; heroin-specific DRD-rate was unchanged with age.Relative to 25–34 years, pooled HRs for UK clients’ methadone-specific deaths were: 0.87 at <25 years (95% CI: 0.56–1.35); 2.14 at 35–44 years (95% CI: 1.76–2.60); 3.75 at 45+ years (95% CI: 2.99–4.70). ConclusionInternational testing and explanation are needed of UK’s sharp age-related increase in the risk of methadone-specific death. Clients should be alerted that their risk of methadone-specific death increases as they age.

Highlights

  • To assess the role of prescribed methadone in explaining the above demographic influences, Gao et al (2016) considered age-group and gender, in addition to prescription source and quintile for the quantity of prescribed methadone, as being potentially informative about the 361 methadone-specific drug-related deaths (DRDs) experienced by 33,000 methadone-prescription clients in Scotland during 121,000 person-years of follow-up in 2009 to 2013

  • Relative to 25–34 year olds in the Scottish methadone-prescription cohort, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for methadone-specific deaths was 0.5 (95%CI: 0.3–1.0) for those aged under 25 years, 1.9 at 35–44 years and 2.9 at 45+ years of age

  • England’s OAP cohort of 129,979 prescribing modality clients was followed-up for 378,009 person-years and experienced 1,266 DRDs, an overall rate of 33 DRDs per 10,000 pys, of which 271 were methadone-specific DRDs and 473 were heroinspecific

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To assess the role of prescribed methadone in explaining the above demographic influences, Gao et al (2016) considered age-group and gender, in addition to prescription source (general practitioner, othersource) and quintile for the quantity of prescribed methadone, as being potentially informative about the 361 methadone-specific DRDs experienced by 33,000 methadone-prescription clients in Scotland during 121,000 person-years of follow-up in 2009 to 2013 Their analysis revealed a steeply increased hazard by age-group, irrespective of gender (which was not prognostic) and that the top quintile for the baseline quantity of prescribed methadone conferred additional hazard for methadone-specific DRDs. Relative to 25–34 year olds in the Scottish methadone-prescription cohort, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for methadone-specific deaths was 0.5 (95%CI: 0.3–1.0) for those aged under 25 years, 1.9 (95% CI: 1.5–2.4) at 35–44 years and 2.9 (95% CI: 2.2–3.9) at 45+ years of age. Methadone-specific DRD-rate per 10,000 person-years was 3.5 (95% CI: 2.7–4.4) at 18–34 years, 8.9 (CI: 7.3–10.5) at 35–44 years and 18 (CI: 13.8–21.2) at 45+ years; heroin-specific DRD-rate was unchanged with age

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call