Abstract

Rural coastal communities face unique disaster risks that will impact interventions throughout the disaster risk reduction (DRR) cycle (mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery). At the same time, these communities are experiencing an ageing population. As climate change contributes to rising sea levels and an increase in the intensity and frequency of climate-related disasters, older populations living in rural coastal communities face heightened risks. This is a qualitative case study examining the ageing in place (AIP) experiences of older people living in a disaster-prone rural coastal community in Hong Kong—Tai O Village. Findings highlight that: (i) a critical dimension of AIP is their ability to sustain and continue their work, which played a multidimensional role, (ii) local community-based organizations play an instrumental role in providing social support in a disaster context, (iii) more support and resources for mitigation activities are needed, and (iv) while supports exist for AIP and in a disaster situation, the older residents may not utilize such supports. In addition to informing age-friendly DRR programmes and research, these findings inform AIP practices, policies, and research relevant to rural coastal communities.

Highlights

  • Ethics approval was obtained from the Human Subjects Ethics Sub-committee (HSESC)

  • Theme: Attachments to Tai O Village Were related to Their Ancestral Homes, a Close-knit

  • This study explored the experiences and perspectives of Ageing in place (AIP) among older people living in a disaster-prone rural coastal community in Tai O Village, Hong Kong

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rural Coastal Communities at the Forefront of Population Ageing “The world’s older population is growing in absolute and relative terms” [1] Ageing in place (AIP) generally refers to empowering older people to remain living, with a level of independence, in the community as they age rather than in institutional care [6]. It is a popular concept adopted in current ageing policies because it is a less costly alternative to institutionalized care and attunes to older people’s increasing preferences to age and live independently in their own home/community [6]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call