Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the prevalence of congenital fetal anomalies or intrauterine fetal growth restriction (IUGR) diagnosed prenatally between two in-vitro fertilization (IVF) methods—fresh embryo transfer (ET) and frozen embryo transfer (FET). Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients that had conceived via IVF, and had a fetal anatomical scan performed at Taiji Clinic between 2015 and 2019. The prevalence of fetal anomalies or IUGR between both IVF methods were compared. Prevalence of congenital anomalies or IUGR by maternal age and embryo transfer type were compared by means of Chi-square analysis. Using multivariate logistic regression, we investigated factors that might be associated with higher rates of fetal anomalies or IUGR, such as parity and number of embryos transferred. ResultsA total of 2441 cases were selected (ET: n = 627 and FET: n = 1814). There was non-significant difference in the prevalence of fetal anomalies or IUGR between ET and FET groups (6.4% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.39). However, among women younger than 34 years of age, prevalence of fetal anomalies or IUGR was significantly higher in ET group (4.6% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.03). ConclusionsOur findings suggest an age-specific effect of IVF method on the rate of fetal anomalies or IUGR and may provide useful information for physicians and infertile couples to optimize their IVF treatment plans and improve birth outcomes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call