Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Data related to AMH levels in non-infertile women are scarce, making interpretation for this population difficult. We aimed to characterize age-based AMH levels in a non-infertile population to simplify interpretation of AMH results. This study represents the largest analysis to date of AMH levels in non-infertile women. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study includes all women undergoing fertility assessments at Extend Fertility Medical Practice, a large oocyte cryopreservation practice, from 3/1/2016 to 9/30/2018. The study was granted IRB exempt status. AMH levels were abstracted from electronic medical records. AMH levels were measure by an independent laboratory using the Gen-II ELISA platform. To simplify clinical interpretation of AMH levels, age was categorized according to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies standard. Association between age and AMH was made using Kruskal-Wallis. RESULTS: 2623 subjects were included in the study. AMH was inversely associated with age (P<.0001). Median [IQR] AMH values by age group were as follows: <30; 2.91 [1.79-4.82] ng/mL (n=107); 30-34; 2.42 [1.38-4.22] ng/mL (n=770); 35-37; 2.03 [1.14-3.54] (n=937); 38-40; 1.50 [0.77-2.69] (n=570); 41-42; 0.92 [0.32-2.19] (n=137); >42; 0.59 [0.25-1.2] (n=101). CONCLUSION: Accurate representation of physiologic AMH ranges in non-infertile women is a critical element of counseling women regarding their reproductive goals. Median AMH levels in our population were generally lower than prior published reports and more likely represent physiologic levels. Data from infertility cohorts may be confounded by anovulatory subjects with preferentially higher AMH levels. Additional studies are needed to assess what thresholds in each age group constitute a pathologic AMH level.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call