Abstract

BackgroundThe root mean square surface electromyographic activity of lumbar extensor muscles during dynamic trunk flexion and extension from standing has repeatedly been recommended to objectively assess muscle function in chronic low back pain patients. However, literature addressing older patients is sparse. This cross sectional study sought to examine differences in neuromuscular activation between age groups (>60 versus 40-60 versus <40 years) and sexes during a standardized trunk flexion-extension task.MethodsA total of 216 patients (62 older, 84 middle-aged, 70 younger) performed maximum trunk extensions followed by trunk flexion extension testing thereby holding static positions at standing, half, and full trunk flexion. The lumbar extensor muscle activity and 3d-accelerometric signals intended to monitor hip and trunk position angles were recorded from the L5 (multifidus) and T4 (semispinalis thoracis) levels. Permutation ANOVA with bootstrapped confidence intervals were performed to examine for age and gender related differences. Ridge-regressions investigated the impact of physical-functional and psychological variables to the half flexion relaxation ratio (i.e. muscle activity at the half divided by that in maximum flexion position).ResultsMaximum back extension torque was slightly but significantly higher in youngest compared to oldest patients if male and females were pooled. Normalized RMS-SEMG revealed highest lumbar extensor muscle activity at standing in the oldest and the female groups. Patients over 60 years showed lowest activity changes from standing to half (increments) and from half to the maximum flexion position (decrements) leading to a significantly lower half flexion relaxation ratio compared to the youngest patients. These oldest patients demonstrated the highest hip and lowest lumbothoracic changes of position angles. Females had higher regional hip and gross trunk ranges of movement compared to males. Lumbothoracic flexion and the muscle activity at standing had a significant impact on the half flexion relaxation ratio.ConclusionsThe neuromuscular activation pattern and the kinematics in this trunk flexion-extension task involving static half flexion position changed according to age and sex. The test has a good potential to discriminate between impaired and unimpaired neuromuscular regulation of back extensors in cLBP patients, thereby allowing the design of more individualized exercise programs.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12984-016-0121-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • The root mean square surface electromyographic activity of lumbar extensor muscles during dynamic trunk flexion and extension from standing has repeatedly been recommended to objectively assess muscle function in chronic low back pain patients

  • High levels of lumbar extensor muscle root mean square (RMS) surface electromyographic (SEMG) activity in maximum trunk flexion position relative to the respective activity maxima during dynamic flexion and re-extension movement phases in these patients have been reversed with clinical improvement after functional restoration programs

  • As we identified upon graphical exploration of flexion relaxation data a considerable number of chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients either with or without back extensor relaxation in maximum trunk flexion relative to the half flexion position, data were split into two groups

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The root mean square surface electromyographic activity of lumbar extensor muscles during dynamic trunk flexion and extension from standing has repeatedly been recommended to objectively assess muscle function in chronic low back pain patients. High levels of lumbar extensor muscle root mean square (RMS) surface electromyographic (SEMG) activity in maximum trunk flexion position relative to the respective activity maxima during dynamic flexion and re-extension movement phases (i.e. low flexion relaxation ratio) in these patients have been reversed with clinical improvement after functional restoration programs. These measurements have been recommended for overall objective evaluation of patients’ functional status and for outcome assessment [10,11,12,13]. At this point it remains unclear whether findings from younger patients apply to older patients

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call