Abstract
ABSTRACTAs non-heternormative sexualities and identities increasingly gain acceptance, the author asks why Lingiardi, Fox, and Ariza each take up different concerns related to gay male sexuality development and object choice at this time. Citing a current rise in tribalism, binary thinking, and societal-level splitting, the author contends that these papers compellingly argue against the loss of symbolic and psychic gay spaces to the benefit of all.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
