Abstract

The central-marginal model is widely accepted in chromosomally polymorphic species of Drosophila. In fact, geographically and ecologically central populations of Drosophila show higher levels of polymorphism for paracentric inversions, whereas marginal populations tend to be monomorphic. This fact has been variously explained. Chromosomal polymorphisms in grasshoppers have also been attributed to show such geographical structuring, as in the case of the South-American grasshopper Dichroplus pratensis Bruner (Orthoptera: Acrididae). However, in three other cases involving Acrididae - Leptysma argentina Bruner, Trimerotropis pallidipennis (Burmeister) and Cornops aquaticum (Bruner), it is clear that chromosomal polymorphisms (sometimes with a wide extension over the Argentine area) do not conform to this pattern, and show instead clear correlations with environmental variables, especially minimum temperature, showing low or null frequencies of the rearrangements at one extreme of the environmental gradient and with high or fixed frequencies at the other. Furthermore, this correlation with temperature might also be true in the case of D. pratensis. These aforementioned examples emphasise the dangers of over-generalization when discussing chromosomal polymorphisms, and suggests that such polymorphisms should be considered very much in a case-specific manner in terms of the particular genetic system under study.

Highlights

  • The central-marginal model was proposed in the 1950s in order to explain the distribution of pericentric inversion polymorphisms in different species of Drosophila (Carson, 1955, 1959; da Cunha et al, 1959)

  • In organisms other than Drosophila, such as the grasshopper Dichroplus pratensis Bruner (Orthoptera: Acrididae), with a complex system of Robertsonian translocations whose effect resembles an inversion polymorphism in the sense that they reduce recombination in carriers of such rearrangements, the authors claim the existence of a central-marginal pattern related to geographical-based structuring in several populations over a wide area in Argentina (Bidau & Martí, 2002, 2005)

  • According to my experience with polymorphic rearrangements in grasshoppers, I have never found a central-marginal pattern; rather, clinal variation was observed in all cases, a situation which may rather be correlated with environmental variables

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The central-marginal model was proposed in the 1950s in order to explain the distribution of pericentric inversion polymorphisms in different species of Drosophila (Carson, 1955, 1959; da Cunha et al, 1959). I provide examples of New World grasshoppers of the family Acrididae, namely Leptysma argentina Bruner, Trimerotropis pallidipennis (Burmeister) and Cornops aquaticum (Bruner), all of which display polymorphisms for different recombination-reducing chromosome rearrangements, and where the central-marginal pattern is clearly not applicable. C. aquaticum is another Leptysmine grasshopper whose distribution ranges from Southern Mexico to Central Argentina and Uruguay (Adis & Junk, 2003; Adis et al, 2004, 2008). It feeds and lays eggs exclusively in water-hyacinths (Pontederiaceae) and has been considered and studied as a potential control agent for water-hyacinths growing plague proportions in other tropical and subtropical regions of the world, mainly in Africa (e.g. Oberholzer & Hill, 2001). The comparative study of chromosome polymorphisms of these ecologically widely different species is important because, despite their differences, similar features emerge when their genetic systems are being compared, especially the relationship between recombination reducing chromosome polymorphisms and environmental variables

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call