‘Against everything that got you into the job’: experiences of potentially morally injurious events among Canadian public safety personnel

Prior research has identified a link between potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) and moral injury, but there is a dearth of research into whether college students may also be at risk of developing moral injury. The present study examined whether PMIEs relate to moral injury among college students and if one type of PMIE (i.e., commission with agency, commission under duress, acts of omission, witnessing, and betrayal) was more salient in predicting moral injury among this population. Participants were 397 U.S.-based college students (63.2% White, non-Hispanic; 61.9% female; 55.2% first-year students) who endorsed exposure to one or more stressful experiences that went against their moral code or values and completed measures on PMIEs and moral injury. Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that betrayal, commission with agency, and acts of omission PMIEs were significantly and positively associated with moral injury total score and moral injury shame-related outcomes, while betrayal and commission under duress were uniquely and positively associated with moral injury trust violation-related outcomes. When a PMIE total score was included in the model, only betrayal remained statistically significantly associated with moral injury trust violation outcomes. The PMIE total score was positively associated with moral injury total score and moral injury shame-related outcomes. These results suggest that college students may be at risk of developing moral injury after PMIE exposure and may benefit from interventions that target specific PMIEs to mitigate moral injury development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

In their work, police officers are routinely exposed to potentially traumatic events, some of which may also be morally distressing. Moral injury refers to the multidimensional impact of exposure to such potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs). Mainly originating from a military context, there is little empirical research on moral injury in policing. The aim of this study was to gain insight into what PMIEs and moral injury in police officers entail. We used a generic qualitative research approach inspired by grounded theory. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 13 treatment-seeking, trauma-exposed police officers at a Dutch national center for psychotrauma. Participants were 11 men and two women with a diagnosis of profession-related posttraumatic stress disorder, who reported being troubled by exposure to a morally transgressive event. Findings were categorized into three categories in terms of PMIEs and moral injury: (1) no high stakes PMIEs, (2) high stakes PMIEs but no moral injury, and (3) high stakes PMIEs and moral injury. Within the third category, three main themes and associated subthemes emerged: (1) a sense of responsibility in death, (2) the illusion of control, and (3) a duty to remember. This study is the first to explore high stakes PMIEs and moral injury in trauma-exposed, help-seeking police officers. Findings show that moral injury seems a relevant clinical concept in policing. PMIEs may change their fundamental self-perception and lead to deep feelings of guilt and shame. Directions for future research include examining police officers' treatment needs and perspectives on "moral recovery." (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

BackgroundResearch in recent years has increasingly highlighted the relationship between exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) and poor mental health outcomes. Human trafficking survivors often report exposure to many traumatic and PMIEs and given the complexities of trafficking exploitation, survivors may be especially vulnerable to moral injury. Despite this, no research has investigated experiences of PMIEs and moral injury in human trafficking survivors. The objective was to explore survivors’ experiences of PMIEs, the impact of PMIEs on wellbeing and functioning and the factors that may influence outcomes following PMIEs.MethodParticipants were seven human trafficking survivors from diverse backgrounds who had settled in the UK. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted via telephone. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsHuman trafficking survivors were found to experience multiple PMIEs, including transgressive acts committed by others and betrayal by trusted loved ones or those in positions of authority. Experiencing PMIEs contributed towards considerable psychological distress, including intense feelings of shame, anger and worthlessness, and negatively impacted survivors daily functioning. Formal support, especially practical help (e.g. warm clothing) and social support groups, were experienced as particularly beneficial.ConclusionsThis study provides some of the first evidence that human trafficking survivors may be vulnerable to moral injury and indicates the impact that exposure to PMIEs can have on functioning. Future work is needed to ensure that statutory organisations consider the potential for causing moral injury when interacting with human trafficking survivors and clinical care teams are equipped to provide tailored guidance and support.

Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) is considered a necessary but insufficient determinant of moral injury (MI) outcomes. However, a question remains regarding possible acts and the necessary features of PMIEs that should be considered transgressive and might lead to MI psychopathological outcomes. We aim to examine the links between exposure to combat incidents within civilian Palestinian populations (CPPs), PMIEs and MI-related outcomes of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (PTSS), trauma-related guilt and shame. We also aim to explore the mediating roles of subjective perceptions of PMIEs in the relationship between exposure to combat incidents within CPP and MI-related outcomes among combat veterans. A volunteer sample of 716 Israeli combat veterans responded to self-report questionnaires in a cross-sectional design study. Exposure to combat incidents within CPP has been primarily associated with perpetration based PMIEs and MI-related guilt outcomes. Importantly, betrayal-based PMIEs mediated the association between reports of being the victim of verbal violence by militants and/or civilians and MI outcomes. Moreover, perpetration-based PMIEs mediated associations between reports of personal acts, or witnessing acts, of physical and verbal violence and degradation by militants and/or civilians, and MI outcomes. Military incidents within civilian populations are related to subjective perceptions of PMIEs and MI-related psychopathological outcomes. While betrayal-based experiences might serve as a mechanism to being a victim of verbal violence and MI outcomes, perpetration-based experiences might serve as mechanisms to physical, verbal and degradation incidents and MI outcomes.

We contextualize and provide commentary on articles in the current issue that address the nature, measurement, and consequences of exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) and moral injury (MI). PMIEs involve acts of commission or omission of oneself and others and can include perpetration of, and failure to prevent, harm; MI includes "the lasting psychological, biological, spiritual, behavioral, and social impact of perpetrating, failing to prevent, or bearing witness to acts that transgress deeply held moral beliefs and expectations" (Litz etal., 2009). New and informative research aims to characterize types of PMIEs among military service members and veterans, including in multinational samples. There are also ongoing efforts to devise outcome scales that reliably capture broad MI outcome themes. Further, several new measures of MI assess emotional, cognitive, and behavioral responses of wrong-doing; the nature of distress following PMIEs in civilians, servicemembers, and veterans; and interpersonal consequences in youth. These are promising efforts toward ecologically valid definitions of a potential MI phenotype. Notably, PMIEs may or may not meet DSM PTSD Criterion A, yet early longitudinal data reveal predictive and reciprocal effects of MI and PTSD on one another. Further, a growing literature on MI outcomes beyond PTSD is identifying ways in which MI is linked to alcohol misuse and self-injurious behaviors. The sum of these efforts has led experts to consider the utility and shortcomings of extant PTSD interventions for individuals with MI. We address clinical implications of this emerging research domain, gaps in the literature, and future directions for research.

Ethical dilemmas for healthcare workers (HCWs) during pandemics highlight the centrality of moral stressors and moral distress (MD) as well as potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) and moral injury (MI). These constructs offer a novel approach to understanding workplace stressors in healthcare settings, especially in the demanding times of COVID-19, but they so far lack clear identification of causes and consequences. A scoping review of moral stressors, moral distress, PMIEs, and MI of healthcare workers during COVID-19 was conducted using the databases Web of Science Core Collection and PsycINFO based on articles published up to October 2021. Studies were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: (1) the measurement of either moral stress, MD, PMIEs, or MI among HCWs; (2) original research using qualitative or quantitative methods; and (3) the availability of the peer-reviewed original article in English or German. The initial search revealed n = 149,394 studies from Web of Science and n = 34 studies from EBSCOhost. Nineteen studies were included in the review. Conditions representing moral stressors and PMIEs as well as MD and MI as their potential outcomes in healthcare contexts during COVID-19 are presented and discussed. Highlighting MD and MI in HCWs during COVID-19 brings attention to the need for conceptualizing the impact of moral stressors of any degree. Therefore, the development of a common, theoretically founded model of MD and MI is desirable.

Moral Injury (MI) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) are potential outcomes following combat military service which exposes veterans to a range of potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs). Given the hypothesized social nature of MI symptoms, it was predicted that System Justification, the tendency to defend and justify systems, even when they may be disadvantageous, would be uniquely related to MI, compared to PTSD. A total of 146 male combat veterans filled in questionnaires relating to PMIEs (MIES), MI (EMIS-short), PTSD symptoms (PCL-5) and System Justification (GSJS). PMIEs (self, other and betrayal related) were all related to higher levels of MI. A parallel mediation model was conducted and demonstrated that PMIEs (self) were associated with higher levels of MI and PTSD symptoms and that MI symptoms mediated the relationship between PMIEs (self) and lower System Justification. There was no mediation effect of PTSD symptoms. This relationship was strongest when veterans did not perform reserve duty and thus were not affiliated with the military. The findings support the theory that MI symptomology, as opposed to PTSD symptomology, has a greater relationship with worldviews such as the relationship to societal systems and that this is greatest when transitioned to civilian life.

Health and psychiatric impairment associated with moral injury, military sexual trauma, and their co-occurrence in U.S. combat veterans

Factors associated with exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) and moral injury in a clinical sample of veterans

Background: Moral Injury (MI) is one of the adverse consequences of combat. Following exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs)––events perceived as violations of deep moral beliefs by oneself or trusted individuals––a significant minority of veterans could develop posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression. Objective: The current study represents the first attempt to apply a network analysis model to examine an exploratory empirical conceptualization of a network of PMIEs during military service, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom clusters, depression, and combat exposure among Israel Defence Forces veterans. Method: A volunteer sample of 191 Israeli combat veterans were recruited during 2017, and completed validated self-report questionnaires tapping PMIEs, PTSD, and depression in a cross-sectional design study. A regularized Gaussian graphical model was estimated. Results: Network analysis revealed strong bridge associations between the PTSD nodes and most of the PMIEs nodes. The nodes of PMIE-betrayal and PTSD negative alterations in cognitions and mood (NACM) symptom cluster were found to have a bridging function between other PMIEs and PTSD. Depression was found to be connected to most of the PMIEs and PTSD nodes. Conclusions: The study’s findings offer an overview of the complex relationships between PMIEs and PTSD clusters among Israeli veterans. PMIEs––notably, betrayal-based experiences––are related to PTSD clusters directly and through depressive symptoms. Some possible mechanisms for the links between PMIEs and PTSD and the clinical implications related to specific interventions are discussed.

Background: Sexual and gender minorities (SGMs) are at an increased risk for developing mental health disorders due to their socially stigmatized identities. Minority stress (i.e. discrimination, identity nondisclosure, internalized stigma) has been shown to impact mental health outcomes among SGMs. Both distal and proximal minority stressors may serve as potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs), which may lead to moral injury and trauma/stressor-related symptoms. Critically, minority stress-related moral injury among SGMs has never before been explored using a mixed-methods approach. Methods: Thirty-seven SGM participants with diverse minority identities participated in the study. Using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design, we conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews, performed clinical assessments, and administered a comprehensive battery of quantitative measures. Here, we modified the Moral Injury Event Scale (MIES) for use with SGMs. Qualitative themes were extracted and then converged with MIES scores to investigate differential thematic presentations based on the quantitative intensity of SGM-related PMIEs. Results: Data analysis indicated four core themes related to moral injury among SGMs: shame (internalizing stigma), guilt, betrayal/loss of trust, and attachment injuries (rejection, altered sense-of-self, and social cognition). The qualitative presentation of these themes differed depending on MIES severity. Attachment injuries emerged as a unique core feature of moral injury among SGMs, whereby the remaining core themes align with previous moral injury research. Furthermore, quantitative analyses revealed that the level of exposure to and intensity of minority stress-related PMIEs was positively associated with hazardous alcohol use and trauma-related symptoms. Conclusions: This is the first mixed-methods study to investigate minority stressors as PMIEs, highlighting how these experiences may contribute to symptoms of moral injury among SGMs. Moral injury may serve as a valuable framework for better understanding trauma-related symptoms and mental health disparities among SGMs. These findings have the potential to inform novel treatment interventions aimed at addressing mental health burdens among SGMs.

Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) among combat veterans has been acknowledged as a significant stressful combat event that may lead to various mental health problems, including depression and moral injury (MI), outcomes of shame and guilt. Recent studies have examined both risk and protective factors that can contribute to PMIEs and their consequences. However, while the general level of one's moral judgment is a logical contributor to moral injuries, it has yet to be examined empirically. In the current study, we examined the unique impact of moral judgment levels on the experience of PMIEs among combat veterans. We also examined the moderating role of moral judgment in the relationship between PMIEs and MI outcomes and depressive symptoms. A volunteer sample of 70 male Israeli combat veterans completed self-report questionnaires and a moral judgment task in a cross-sectional design study. Our findings indicate that moral judgment contributed to higher levels of perceiving others' actions as transgressive (PMIE-Other), above and beyond combat exposure. Moreover, we found that moral judgment has a moderating role in the link between PMIEs and their negative outcomes: Among veterans with higher levels of moral judgment, the association between PMIEs and their expressions was stronger than for those with lower levels of moral judgment. Our finding highlights the unique contribution of moral judgment level to PMIEs and their mental health consequences. It can be cautiously suggested that moral judgment should be viewed as a pre-recruitment risk factor that can help identify those at greater risk for mental health problems following exposure to PMIEs.

Moral injury (MI) refers to the persisting distress which may occur following exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs). The COVID-19 pandemic has drawn attention to MI in healthcare workers, who have been found to experience more frequent PMIEs in their day-to-day work than those in other occupational groups such as the military. These events may occur on an individual, team, organizational or system level and have been associated with increased clinician burnout and distress, and poor psychological wellbeing. This paper focuses on healthcare workers’ experiences of MI, including potential causes and ways to reduce them. There are myriad challenges that influence the development of MI, such as chronic understaffing and the pressure to treat high numbers of patients with limited resources. There are also multiple impacts of MI: at the individual-level, MI can lead to increased staff absences and understaffing, and prolonged patient contact with limited decision-making power. COVID-19 exacerbated such impacts, with a lack of organizational support during a time of increased patient mortality, and uncertainty and heightened pressure on the clinical frontline associated with scarce resources and understaffing. Potential methods for reduction of MI in healthcare workers include pre-exposure mitigation, such as fostering work environments which treat PMIEs in the same way as other occupational hazards and post-exposure mitigation, such as facilitating healthcare workers to process their experiences of PMIEs in peer support groups or with spiritual advisors and, if MI is associated with mental ill-health, talking therapies using trauma-focused and compassion-oriented frameworks.

Background Moral injury (MI) is a potential clinical problem associated with distress following exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs). While previous studies have linked PMIEs to MI outcomes such as shame and trust violation, few have examined the role of pre-enlistment personality traits in predicting MI. This study investigates whether pre-deployment aggression contributes to MI outcomes among recently discharged Israeli combat veterans, both directly and indirectly, through exposure to PMIEs. Design A six-year longitudinal study. Methods 169 Israeli combat veterans were assessed at four time points: pre-enlistment (T1), pre-deployment (T2), post-deployment (T3), and post-discharge (T4) with validated self-report questionnaires. Results Structural equation modeling results showed pre-deployment aggression (T2) significantly predicted post-discharge MI outcomes of shame and trust violation (T4), above and beyond combat exposure and negative life events. Additionally, PMIE-betrayal (T3) emerged as a key mediator linking aggression (T2) to MI outcomes (T4). Conclusions Pre-enlistment aggression is a significant risk factor for MI, primarily through its association with betrayal-based PMIEs. These findings highlight the importance of early screening for aggression traits, and the need for targeted interventions to address MI, particularly interventions focused on betrayal-related distress and self-directed moral emotions.

Exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIEs) during military service is associated with mental health problems. However, knowledge about these associations and possible mechanisms of effect among female combat veterans is sparse. This study examines associations between PMIEs, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), complex PTSD, depression and anxiety symptoms among female veterans, as well as the mediating role of disruption in assumptive world and moral injury (MI) symptoms. A volunteer sample of Israeli female combat veterans (n=885) and non-combat veterans (n=728) responded to self-report questionnaires in a cross-sectional design study. Results show that combat veterans reported higher levels of PMIEs, PTSD and MI symptoms, but not CPTSD, depression and anxiety symptoms, as compared to non-combat veterans. Importantly, PMIEs was indirectly associated with PTSD, complex PTSD, depression and anxiety symptoms through serial mediators of disruption in assumptive world and MI symptoms. This study emphasized the exposure to PMIEs and its posttraumatic sequelae among female combat veterans as compared to non-combat veterans. Our findings also suggest that future longitudinal studies should examine the mediating role of disruption in assumptive world and MI symptoms for the deleterious effects of exposure to PMIEs during military service.