Abstract
Lord Chief Justice Mansfield declared in Somerset v. Stewart (1772) that the nature of slavery is “so odious … nothing can be suffered to support it but positive law.” In this essay, I trace the principle laid down in Somerset through several cases that occurred during the first quarter of the nineteenth century, and I pay particular attention to two conservative judicial opinions in the 1820’s: Chief Justice John Marshall's opinion in The Antelope (1825) and Lord Stowell's opinion in The Slave Grace (1827). In each of these cases, practical considerations trump the antislavery constitutional tradition emanating from the Somerset decision. Rather than reflecting the triumph of illiberal constitutional theories, I argue that these cases demonstrate the ongoing tension between normative constitutional principles and practical political considerations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
