Abstract

Abstract The International Space Station (ISS) is heralded as a political and engineering success that provides a firm foothold for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and its international partners to send crews to visit and operate in low-Earth orbit (LEO). For current NASA leadership, the future of LEO rests in the hands of U.S. private industry in which NASA is a buyer of services, including human spaceflight services, which are owned and operated by private companies. The NASA human spaceflight strategy is to send crew missions to cislunar space and to transition ISS capabilities over to commercial habitats and platforms in LEO by the 2020s. This article argues that it is unlikely that market forces and industry capabilities will be strong enough by the mid-2020s to support commercial habitats without direct NASA support. Therefore, NASA should study the costs and timelines of extending the ISS past the mid-2020s versus procuring short-duration commercial platforms. If cislunar h...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.