Abstract
This essay examines the significance of the fortuitous Fisher v. University of Texas Supreme Court decision within a broader historical framework of similar affirmative action legal disputes. The author locates Fisher among a historical trajectory of manoeuvres intended to destabilise modest Civil Rights Era advances toward racial justice. Leonardo’s ‘educational criticism’ is considered as a possible conceptual analysis to take up the continuing problem of race, education and the law in our colour-blind era. Despite the Fisher decision affirming the continued permissibility of limited racial considerations in college admissions, a careful examination of how race is understood from a legal perspective reveals a disconcerting revelation. That is, racial justice advocates in education should temper our enthusiasm for Fisher against evidence that the Supreme Court’s understanding of racism has unquestionably gone backwards. Because of this, Fisher is at best a problematic step toward meaningful integration, and at worst an instantiation of whiteness rising.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.