Abstract
Abstract This chapter discusses the diverging regulatory responses of Australia and New Zealand in the aftermath of the March 2019 Christchurch attack. It discusses how Australia quickly passed the Sharing of Abhorrent Violent Material Act, a muscular contested platform regulation strategy. Across the Tasman Sea, New Zealand instead, after initially considering a similar approach, ended up orchestrating a global, collaborative, voluntary regulatory initiative with industry: the Christchurch Call to Counter Violent Extremism. The chapter shows how two countries can be driven by political realities to respond to the same event with very different strategies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
