Abstract

AbstractAfrica's Cenozoic tectonism is often attributed to mantle plumes, particularly below East Africa, but their morphology, number, location, and impact on the African lithosphere are debated. The broad slow wavespeed African Superplume, ubiquitous in large‐scale tomographic models, originates below South Africa, reaching the surface somewhere below East Africa. However, whether the diverse East African mantle geochemistry is best reconciled with one heterogeneous upwelling, or current tomographic models lack the resolution to image multiple distinct plumes, remains enigmatic. S‐wavespeed tomographic images of Africa are legion, but higher frequency P‐wavespeed whole‐mantle models possessing complementary diagnostic capabilities are comparatively lacking. This hinders attempts to disentangle the effects of Cenozoic hotspot tectonism and Pan African (and older) tectonic events on the East African lithosphere. Here we develop a continental‐scale P‐wave tomographic model capable of resolving structure from upper‐to‐lower mantle depths using a recently developed technique to extract absolute arrival‐times from noisy, temporary African seismograph deployments. Shallow‐mantle wavespeeds are δVP ≈ −4% below Ethiopia, but less anomalous (δVP ≥–2%) below other volcanic provinces. The heterogeneous African Superplume reaches the upper mantle below the Kenyan plateau. Below Ethiopia/Afar we image a second sub‐vertical slow wavespeed anomaly rooted near the core‐mantle boundary outside the African LLVP, meaning multiple disparately sourced whole‐mantle plumes may influence East African magmatism. In contrast to other African cratons, wavespeeds below Tanzania are only fast to 90–135 km depth. When interpreted alongside Lower Eocene on‐craton kimberlites, our results support pervasive metasomatic lithospheric modification caused by subduction during the Neoproterozoic Pan‐African orogeny.

Highlights

  • Bryce, et al, 2006; Pik et al, 2006; Rooney, 2017)

  • Swavespeed tomographic images of Africa are legion, but higher-frequency P-wavespeed whole-mantle models possessing complementary diagnostic capabilities are comparatively lacking. This hinders attempts to disentangle the effects of Cenozoic hotspot tectonism and Pan African tectonic events on the East African lithosphere

  • Ethiopia/Afar we image a second sub-vertical slow wavespeed anomaly rooted near the core-mantle boundary outside the African Large Low Velocity Province (LLVP), meaning multiple disparately sourced whole-mantle plumes may influence East African magmatism

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bryce, et al, 2006; Pik et al, 2006; Rooney, 2017). Tomographic models generally reveal a broad (∼500 km-wide), inclined, slow wavespeed anomaly extending to the core-mantle boundary below South Africa: the African Superplume (e.g., Ritsema et al, 1999; Li et al, 2008). Numerous authors have used converted wave phases in an effort to constrain the composition and temperature of the East African mantle transition zone with possible implications for the development of East Africa’s plateau uplift and Cenozoic magmatism (e.g., Huerta et al, 2009; Cornwell et al, 2011; Julia & Nyblade, 2013; Mulibo & Nyblade, 2013a; Thompson et al, 2015; Reed et al, 2016) These studies offer limited consensus on the number, geometry and thermochemical nature of upwellings penetrating the East African upper mantle. Several other mid-to-upper mantle low wavespeed anomalies have been interpreted as evidence for mantle upwellings in East Africa (e.g., Chang & Van der Lee, 2011; Chang et al, 2015; Civiero et al, 2015), the Atlas Mountains (e.g., Civiero et al, 2018), Madagascar (e.g., Pratt et al, 2017) and the Cameroon Volcanic Line (e.g., Reusch et al, 2010; French & Romanowicz, 2015; Emry et al, 2019)

Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.