Abstract

In this paper, I argue that African environmental ethics can contribute to sustainable development as well as mitigate the devastating effects of global warming and climate change in Africa. Although Africa bears the least onus of responsibility for global warming and climate change, she suffers the greatest burden of the adverse effects of global climate change and environmental crisis. While industrialized countries, nations which are largely responsible for the greatest amount of greenhouse emissions are laggard and reticent in implementing international agreements aimed at palliating the untoward effects of climate change, there is an urgent need to seek indigenous solutions to environmental crisis in Africa without compromising the much needed development in the continent. African environmental ethics extends the moral community beyond anthropocentric concerns by including non-human animals, plants, the unborn, and the supernatural into the moral universe. I use Kom environmental ethics to show how indigenous African societies employed different values and customs to make their environment physically and spiritually sustainable. There were taboos, values, and norms which prescribed correct behavior towards nature. But as a result of the colonial encounter, Africans were forced to abandon some of these indigenous environmental values and sustainable practices for an anthropocentric approach. With this outlook where humans have moral responsibility only towards humans, development meant the complete disregard for traditional African holistic values and customs. This disregard, in conjunction with weak or absence of institutional framework regarding environmental protection and corruption in the management of natural resources, has led to unsustainable exploitation of the natural environment in Africa.

Highlights

  • Today we are faced with a challenge that calls for a shift in our thinking, so that humanity stops threatening its life support system

  • I argue that African environmental ethics can contribute to sustainable development as well as mitigate the devastating effects of global warming and climate change in Africa

  • Some scholars have argued that Africans have little or nothing to contribute to environmental ethics because African ethics is essentially anthropocentric (Callicot, 1994: p. 158)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Today we are faced with a challenge that calls for a shift in our thinking, so that humanity stops threatening its life support system. I argue that it is time for African governments to start appraising and encourage the re-institution of traditional conservationist values and practices to help extenuate the adverse effects of climate change in Africa and promote sustainable development on the continent. It may, be overly simplistic to think that the current environmental challenges in Africa have been primarily caused by colonialism. According to African traditional environmental ethics, human beings are mere co-occupants of nature with other species without any heavenly mandate to dominate, subdue, and exploit nature This attitude toward nature is diametrically opposed to the mechanistic and anthropocentric outlook initiated by Francis. This is an attitude that has resulted in an epistemological injustice against non-Western systems of knowledge

The Relation between Environmental Ethics and Sustainability
African Environmental Ethics: A Kom Perspective
Nature and Moral Consciousness in the African Universe
Environmental Crisis in Africa
Promoting African Environmental Values for Sustainable Development
Enhancing Sustainable Development through the Participation of Local People
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call