Abstract
ABSTRACT Stretching the bounds of the client advocacy role beyond what is sound, credible, and/or reasonable may threaten compliance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct (Code) (ET 1.140.010.03). Students evaluate real-life requests of a CPA to determine whether the client advocacy role was stretched and violated compliance with the Code. More specifically, students apply the Code’s principles, select rules of conduct, and threats to analyze and evaluate a CPA’s responses to her client’s requests that she provide bankers with financial and other information and reclassify income as debt. Student perceptions and knowledge pretests and post-tests indicate completion of the case increased students’ knowledge about the Code and required them to apply analytical and critical thinking skills. In addition, students believe the completion of the case was enjoyable and provided a valuable learning experience. Data Availability: Anonymous data are available upon request. JEL Classifications: M410; M420.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
