Abstract

In this study, 30 genotypes of genus Pyrus (five European cultivars, 16 Asian cultivars, three rootstocks, four interspecific hybrids, one landrace cultivar from Czech Republic (‘Krvavka’), Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge. and one intergeneric hybrid (Cydomalus)) were tested using AFLP markers. Twelve primer combinations generated a number of 1251 fragments of which 1064 were polymorphic with an average polymorphism of 85.3%. The dendrogram, created by using the UPGMA method, revealed a distinct genetic relationship between European and Asian pear groups. The intergeneric hybrid Cydomalus was separated in the cluster tree from both groups. The level of similarity coefficient between European and Asian pears was 0.75. Despite the fact that Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge was clustered in the European pear group, the average similarity coefficient between the European pear group and Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge (0.7704) was comparable to the similarity coefficient between the Asian pear group and Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge (0.768). Thus, the botanic species Pyrus betulaefolia Bunge can likely be considered as an intermediate genotype between European and Asian pears. The cultivar ‘Talgarskaja Krasavica’ (chance seedling of ‘Forest Beauty’), which pomologically belongs to the European pear group was clustered together with the interspecific hybrid ‘Wu Jiu Xinag’ (‘Ya Li’ × ‘Bartlett’) which on the other hand belongs to the Asian pear group. Thus, due to its position in the dendrogram the cultivar ‘Talgarskaja Krasavica’ could be considered as an interspecific hybrid.

Highlights

  • Pears are the third most important temperate fruit species after apples and grapes (Wu et al, 2013)

  • Japanese pears derived from wild Pyrus pyrifolia (Burm.) Nak., which originates in Middle and Southern Japan (Teng, 2004)

  • Like Japanese pears, Chinese sand pears arose from Pyrus pyrifolia (Burm.) Nak. (Shen, 1980)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pears are the third most important temperate fruit species after apples and grapes (Wu et al, 2013). 20 RAPD markers were used for division of 72 Asian and European pears into 5 genetic groups (Teng et al, 2001), while by use of 6 SSR markers another set of 98 Pyrus genotypes were divided into 10 groups (Bao et al, 2007) and 6 AFLP markers used for division of 100 Pyrus genotypes created 15 groups (Bao et al, 2008). Based on these methods, new relationships between cultivars and wild species were discovered. Determination of taxonomic relationships between pear cultivars, Asian pear group cultivars grown in Czech Republic, can be useful to deduce their likely origin and to help in selection of progenitors for breeding programs

Materials and Methods
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call