Abstract

Music composing is associated with various positive learning outcomes, but in several countries, such as Finland, it is not part of the primary school music curriculum. There are several issues as to why music composing is not taught at schools, such as beliefs that composing requires extensive knowledge of music theory, lack of teachers’ confidence, lack of evidence on the method’s effectiveness and difficulty of assessment. Composing software has the potential of solving some of these issues, as they are connected to mathematics via music theory and technology, and with practical opportunities arising from adopting phenomenon-based learning at schools, the affordances of music composing technologies for learning mathematics are investigated in this study. For this purpose, 57 music composing software were categorised and reviewed. Our analysis identified eight types of music visualisations and five types of note input methods. The music visualisations were compared to the mathematics content in the Finnish primary school curriculum and the note input methods were evaluated based on their relationship to the music visualisations. The coordinate grid-based piano roll was the most common visualisation and the tracker visualisation had the most affordances for learning primary school math. Music composing software were found to have affordances for teaching mathematical concepts, notations and basic calculus skills, among others. Composing methods involving direct interaction with visualisations support the experiential learning of music theory, and consequently, the learning of mathematics. Based on the findings of this study, we concluded that music composing is a promising activity through which mathematics and music theory can be learned at primary schools.

Highlights

  • Music in general has been found to, for example, reduce stress and anxiety (Nilsson 2008), support literacy development (Paquette and Rieg 2008), enhance motivation to exercise (Edworthy and Waring 2006) and affect feelings (Habibi and Damasio 2014), which have holistic positive effects on a persons’ life (Thompson 2015)

  • Music composing has historically not been taught to others than exceptionally gifted children, at least partly due to the presumption that it is an activity that requires extensive knowledge of music theory, mastery of Western music notation and sufficient skill on at least one instrument (Beckstead 2001; Pope et al 1995)

  • Modern music technology removes the two later arguments, as mastery of Western music notation and mastery of an instrument can be replaced by mastery of composing software

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Music in general has been found to, for example, reduce stress and anxiety (Nilsson 2008), support literacy development (Paquette and Rieg 2008), enhance motivation to exercise (Edworthy and Waring 2006) and affect feelings (Habibi and Damasio 2014), which have holistic positive effects on a persons’ life (Thompson 2015). The argument for the need for knowledge of music theory still stands; a composing software can be seen as an object through which learning of music theory can happen. It can, be argued that instead of seeing music theory as a requirement to start composing, music theory can be learned by composing. It is reasonable to presume that with sufficient tools to learn with, that is, construals at disposal (Beynon 2012), music theory can be learned through composing music, instead of seeing quite vast music theory knowledge as a prerequisite for starting to compose music

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call