Abstract

Whereas governments are increasingly considering affirmative action programs to increase corporate board diversity, the effect of such programs can be superficial as they do not address the underlying problem, which is women's access to and inclusion in relevant corporate networks. To address this issue, we study the relationship among affirmative action programs (binding gender quotas and non-binding gender targets), director networks, and the number of board positions individual directors hold given their gender. We use personal, professional, and network characteristics of 25,127 unique directors from 2,435 public firms in 32 European countries over the period of 2000 through 2017. We find that in the absence of affirmative action programs, women directors benefit less from their networks than men directors suggesting the existence of a gender gap in network benefits. After the passage of binding gender quotas, this gender gap in network benefits narrows between women and men directors. Overall, this research suggests that binding gender quotas enhance the inclusion of women in corporate director networks and may help in leveling the playing field in the way these networks are used for achieving top management positions.

Highlights

  • We study the relationship among affirmative action programs, director networks, and the number of board positions individual directors hold given their gender

  • We study the link between affirmative action programs, director networks, and the number of board positions directors hold by leveraging a large data set of individual directors in European public firms over the period of 2000 and 2017

  • We study the link between affirmative action programs, director networks, and the number of board positions directors hold at European public firms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For both women and men directors, the marginal effects of eigenvector centrality for the number of board positions are positive and statistically significant before and after the passage of binding gender quotas and non-binding gender targets. We use ordinary least squares estimations to compare the number of board positions directors hold between our treated and control samples, both before and after the passage of affirmative action programs.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call