Abstract

SummaryBackgroundMeasuring anti-spike protein antibodies in human plasma or serum is commonly used to determine prior exposure to SARS-CoV-2 infection and to assess the anti-viral protection capacity. According to the mass-action law, a lesser concentration of tightly binding antibody can produce the same quantity of antibody-antigen complexes as higher concentrations of lower affinity antibody. Thus, measurements of antibody levels reflect both affinity and concentration. These two fundamental parameters cannot be disentangled in clinical immunoassays, and so produce a bias which depends on the assay format.MethodsTo determine the apparent affinity of anti-spike protein antibodies, a small number of antigen-coated magnetic microparticles were imaged by fluorescence microscopy after probing antigen-antibody equilibria directly in patient plasma. Direct and indirect anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays were used to measure antibody levels in the blood of infected and immunised individuals.FindingsWe observed affinity maturation of antibodies in convalescent and vaccinated individuals, showing that higher affinities are achieved much faster by vaccination. We demonstrate that direct and indirect immunoassays for measuring anti-spike protein antibodies depend differently on antibody affinity which, in turn, affects accurate interpretation of the results.InterpretationDirect immunoassays show substantial antibody affinity dependence. This makes them useful for identifying past SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Indirect immunoassays provide more accurate quantifications of anti-viral antibody levels.FundingThe authors are all full-time employees of Abbott Laboratories. Abbott Laboratories provided all operating funds. No external funding sources were used in this study.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call