Abstract
I HAVE just read with much interest the paper in NATURE by Mr. W. Saville Kent, criticising my friend Carter's article in the “Annals of Natural History” for this month, in which I fully concur. How Mr. Carter can have fallen into such an error, for such I must call it. I cannot imagine, as comparing a group of animals in Botryllus to those sponge cells, even in so highly a developed form as Grantia. For, taking this as the highest known form of sponge animal, it is at most only a monociliated sac, as shown both by Prof. Clark and by Mr. Carter. Now, it is well known to all investigators, and Mr. Carter has shown it himself, that the animals of Botryllus have distinct oral and fæcal apertures, whereas the sponge cell, so far as has yet been seen, has only an oral aperture. Again, the Ascidian Botryllus is shown to be far higher in the scale when we come to compare its internal organisation, and not merely to confine ourselves to the sac-like tunic. The discharge of the fæcal matter into a common cloacal canal is to me not a sufficient reason for comparing these groups of animals to the sponge animals in Grantia.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.