Affinities of Certain Cretaceous Plant Remains Commonly Referred to the Genera Dammara and Brachyphyllum

Abstract

Previous articleNext article FreeAffinities of Certain Cretaceous Plant Remains Commonly Referred to the Genera Dammara and BrachyphyllumArthur Hollick and Edward C. JeffreyArthur Hollick Search for more articles by this author and Edward C. Jeffrey Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 40, Number 471Mar., 1906 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/278613 Views: 77Total views on this site Citations: 17Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Frédéric Thevenard, Oleksandra Chernomorets, Jean-David Moreau, Didier Neraudeau, Marc Philippe A review of the Hirmeriellaceae (Cheirolepidiaceae) wood, IAWA Journal 43, no.44 (Aug 2022): 428–447.https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-bja10099Ana Andruchow‐Colombo, María A. Gandolfo, Ignacio H. Escapa, Néstor R. Cúneo New genus of Cupressaceae from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia (Argentina) fills a gap in the evolution of the ovuliferous complex in the family, Journal of Systematics and Evolution 9 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12842Maria Edenilce Peixoto Batista, Ariel Milani Martine, Antônio Álamo F. Saraiva, Flaviana Jorge de Lima, Olga A. Barros, Artur A.A. Sá, Maria Iracema Bezerra Loiola Brachyphyllum: State of the art and new data regarding B. obesum, the most representative fossil plant in the Araripe Basin, Brazil, Journal of South American Earth Sciences 37 (Jun 2021): 103405.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103405Maria E. P. Batista, Lutz Kunzmann, Artur A. Sá, Antônio Á. F. Saraiva, Maria I. B. Loiola A New Species of Brachyphyllum from the Crato Formation (Lower Cretaceous), Araripe Basin, Brazil, Ameghiniana 57, no.66 (Dec 2020).https://doi.org/10.5710/AMGH.23.06.2020.3333Chris Mays, David J. Cantrill Protodammara reimatamoriori , a new species of conifer (Cupressaceae) from the Upper Cretaceous Tupuangi Formation, Chatham Islands, Zealandia, Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology 43, no.11 (Jan 2018): 114–126.https://doi.org/10.1080/03115518.2017.1417478Chris Mays, Andrew J. Coward, Luke A. O'Dell, Ralf Tappert The botanical provenance and taphonomy of Late Cretaceous Chatham amber, Chatham Islands, New Zealand, Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 260 (Jan 2019): 16–26.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2018.08.004Chris Mays, David J. Cantrill, Joseph J. Bevitt Polar wildfires and conifer serotiny during the Cretaceous global hothouse, Geology 45, no.1212 (Oct 2017): 1119–1122.https://doi.org/10.1130/G39453.1Maria Edenilce Peixoto Batista, Delmira da Costa Silva, Marcos A. F. Sales, Artur A. Sá, Antônio A. F. Saraiva, Maria Iracema Bezerra Loiola, William Oki Wong New data on the stem and leaf anatomy of two conifers from the Lower Cretaceous of the Araripe Basin, northeastern Brazil, and their taxonomic and paleoecological implications, PLOS ONE 12, no.33 (Mar 2017): e0173090.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173090Jiří Kvaček, Radek Vodrážka Late Cretaceous flora of the Hidden Lake Formation, James Ross Island (Antarctica), its biostratigraphy and palaeoecological implications, Cretaceous Research 58 (Mar 2016): 183–201.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2015.09.014Louaï Machhour, Denise Pons Bois de coniférales dans l'Albien du synclinal du Beausset (Var, SE France): Signification paléogéographique et paléoclimatique, Geobios 25, no.22 (Jan 1992): 181–193.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-6995(06)80394-3Constantine A. LaPasha, Charles N. Miller NEW TAXODIACEOUS SEED CONES FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF NEW JERSEY, American Journal of Botany 68, no.1010 (Nov 1981): 1374–1382.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1981.tb07848.x Ruth A. Stockey , and Thomas N. Taylor Cuticular Features and Epidermal Patterns in the Genus Araucaria de Jussieu, Botanical Gazette 139, no.44 (Oct 2015): 490–498.https://doi.org/10.1086/337024Charles N. Miller Mesozoic conifers, The Botanical Review 43, no.22 (Apr 1977): 217–280.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860718RUDOLF FLORIN THE FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE ORGANS OF CONIFERS AND TAXADS, Biological Reviews 29, no.44 (Nov 1954): 367–389.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1954.tb01515.xJohn S. Penny STUDIES ON THE CONIFERS OF THE MAGOTHY FLORA, American Journal of Botany 34, no.55 (May 1947): 281–296.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1947.tb12989.xY. Suzuki On the Structure and Affinities of Two New Conifers and A New Fungus from the Upper Cretaceous of Hokkaido (Yezo), Shokubutsugaku Zasshi 24, no.284284 (Jan 1910): en181–en196.https://doi.org/10.15281/jplantres1887.24.284_181Edward W. Berry Recent Discussions of the Origin of Gymnosperms, Science 25, no.638638 (Mar 1907): 470–472.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.25.638.470