Abstract

Emotional signals, like threatening sounds, automatically ready the perceiver to prepare an appropriate defense behavior. Conjecturing that this would manifest itself in extending the safety zone around the body we used the rubber hand illusion (RHI) to test this prediction. The RHI is a perceptual illusion in which body ownership is manipulated by synchronously stroking a rubber hand and real hand occluded from view. Many factors, both internal and external, have been shown to influence the strength of the illusion, yet the effect of emotion perception on body ownership remains unexplored. We predicted that listening to affective vocalizations would influence how strongly participants experience the RHI. In the first experiment four groups were tested that listened either to affective sounds (angry or happy vocalizations), non-vocal sounds or no sound while undergoing synchronous or asynchronous stroking of the real and rubber hand. In a second experiment three groups were tested comparing angry or neutral vocalizations and no sound condition. There was a significantly larger drift towards the rubber hand in the emotion versus the no emotion conditions. We interpret these results in the framework that the spatial increase in the RHI indicates that under threat the body has the capacity to extend its safety zone.

Highlights

  • Emotional expressions are powerful triggers that at the same time communicate affective information, while requiring situation-appropriate responses

  • The results of the mixed ANOVA on average proprioceptive drift showed a significant effect of stroking condition (F(1,107) = 35.483, p < .001), with higher proprioceptive drift in synchronous than in asynchronous stroking, confirming a successful induction of the rubber hand illusion when the rubber hand and the real hand are stroked synchronously

  • The current experiment set out to explore the influence of emotional stimuli on body ownership as measured in the rubber hand illusion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Emotional expressions are powerful triggers that at the same time communicate affective information, while requiring situation-appropriate responses. When confronted with threatening information in our direct vicinity, we can expect physiological responses like a change in heart rate [8], skin conductance, pupil size [9], and pre-activation of our muscles [4]. This readiness for action is reflected in the body, and in the brain, where it becomes apparent that motor.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call