Abstract

Affective touch and cutaneous pain are two sub-modalities of interoception with contrasting affective qualities (pleasantness/unpleasantness) and social meanings (care/harm), yet their direct relationship has not been investigated. In 50 women, taking into account individual attachment styles, we assessed the role of affective touch and particularly the contribution of the C tactile (CT) system in subjective and electrophysiological responses to noxious skin stimulation, namely N1 and N2-P2 laser-evoked potentials. When pleasant, slow (versus fast) velocity touch was administered to the (non-CT-containing) palm of the hand, higher attachment anxiety predicted increased subjective pain ratings, in the same direction as changes in N2 amplitude. By contrast, when pleasant touch was administered to CT-containing skin of the arm, higher attachment anxiety predicted attenuated N1 and N2 amplitudes. Higher attachment avoidance predicted opposite results. Thus, CT-based affective touch can modulate pain in early and late processing stages (N1 and N2 components), with the direction of effects depending on attachment style. Affective touch not involving the CT system seems to affect predominately the conscious perception of pain, possibly reflecting socio-cognitive factors further up the neurocognitive hierarchy. Affective touch may thus convey information about available social resources and gate pain responses depending on individual expectations of social support.This article is part of the themed issue ‘Interoception beyond homeostasis: affect, cognition and mental health’.

Highlights

  • Affective touch and cutaneous pain are two sub-modalities of interoception that have contrasting affective qualities and social meanings

  • At least some affectively pleasant tactile sensations are thought to be coded by specialized unmyelinated C tactile (CT) afferent fibres; these are found only in hairy skin and microneurography studies have shown that they selectively respond to innocuous tactile stimulation at slow velocities (1–10 cm s21), with their activation being highly correlated with perceived pleasantness [4]

  • This study investigated whether affective touch modulated subjective and neural responses to pain and whether the direction of effects depended on individual differences in attachment styles

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Affective touch and cutaneous pain are two sub-modalities of interoception that have contrasting affective qualities (pleasantness/unpleasantness) and social meanings (care/harm). In this study, we considered the role of indi- 2 vidual differences in attachment styles, while examining how subjective and neural responses to noxious stimuli may be modulated by low pressure, slow velocity dynamic touch by another individual, which is expected to evoke pleasant sensations [4]. These investigations afford several methodological advantages compared to hand-holding or ‘massage-like’ manipulations. To visualize effects of attachment style, we plotted effects at +1 s.d. of the sample mean for attachment anxiety and avoidance, using unstandardized parameter estimates [47]

Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call