Abstract
Indifference has long been acknowledged as a crucial affect to the continuation of bureaucratic practices. Recently, the production of more diverse and layered affective modes in bureaucratic institutions is increasingly highlighted. However, how affects differ within and between sites saturated with ‘paper work’ remains an understudied terrain. In this paper we focus on the relations that are formed in daily file-work within two state institutions: a Deportation Unit and a Criminal Court. We draw on ethnographic fieldwork in order to show that a) affects are locally produced in the relations that are mobilized in file-work b) these affects are unevenly produced within and between different bureaucratic practices. By comparing two different bureaucratic settings yet related in the subjugation they demand of the bureaucratic referent of their practices, we aim to put forward how differences in bureaucratic practice come with their own specific affective modes, showing that bureaucratic practices are saturated in, and thrive on, diverse affects of varying intensity. Bureaucratic action is a deeply affective practice, within which the relationship between caseworker, casefile, and the file’s referent is carefully calibrated. With this intervention we position ourselves within scholarship that complicates perceived dichotomies between rationality, still often associated with bureaucracy, and affect. Developing sensitivities towards such variety of bureaucratic affect offers nuanced perspectives on file-work and what kind of sovereign power the relations that are made through file-work subsequently allow to be reproduced.
Highlights
Indifference has long been acknowledged as a crucial affect to the continuation of bureaucratic practices
We looked into affects mobilized in bureaucratic relations with the modest ambition to catch glimpses of ‘bureaucratic affects’ rather than offering definite explanations about them
In our settings we witnessed a variety of affects to arise and – importantly – were sensitized about the specificity of their mobilization depending on the relations that are made between casefiles, file-workers, and file-referents in specific moments of the bureaucratic practice that brings them together: file-work
Summary
Indifference has long been acknowledged as a crucial affect to the continuation of bureaucratic practices. Keywords Bureaucracy, affect, file-work, relationality, deportation unit, criminal court
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have