Abstract

A qualitative fit test using bitter-tasting aerosols is the commonest way to determine filtering face-piece (FFP) mask leakage. This taste test is subjective and biased by placebo. We propose a cheap, quantitative modification of the taste test by measuring the amount of fluorescein stained filter paper behind the mask using image analysis. A bitter-tasting fluorescein solution was aerosolised during mask fit tests, with filter paper placed on masks' inner surfaces. Participants reported whether they could taste bitterness to determine taste test 'pass' or 'fail' results. Filter paper photographs were digitally analysed to quantify total fluorescence (TF). Fifty-six healthcare professionals were fit tested; 32 (57%) 'passed' the taste test. TF between the taste test 'pass' and 'fail' groups was significantly different (p<0.001). A cut-off (TF = 5.0 × 106 units) was determined at precision (78%) and recall (84%), resulting in 5/56 participants (9%) reclassified from 'pass' to 'fail' by the fluorescein test. Seven out of 56 (12%) reclassified from 'fail' to 'pass'. Fluorescein is detectable and sensitive at identifying FFP mask leaks. These low-cost adaptations can enhance exiting fit testing to determine 'pass' and 'fail' groups, protecting those who 'passed' the taste test but have high fluorescein leak, and reassuring those who 'failed' the taste test despite having little fluorescein leak.

Highlights

  • A qualitative fit test using bitter-tasting aerosols is the commonest way to determine filtering face-piece (FFP) mask leakage

  • We propose a novel fit test method by applying simple and well-established image analysis techniques to detect the amount of fluorescent staining on filter paper behind Filtering face-piece (FFP) masks after a testing protocol using aerosolised fluorescein

  • The main objectives of this study are to determine whether fluorescein is detectable in this context and whether this method is sufficiently discriminating to be used for fit testing of healthcare workers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A qualitative fit test using bitter-tasting aerosols is the commonest way to determine filtering face-piece (FFP) mask leakage. This taste test is subjective and biased by placebo. FFP3 masks (equivalent to N99 in the USA) offer the highest grade of filtration and filter at least 99% of airborne particles, with an inward leak of approximately 2%.10,11. Leaks could risk transmission of virus particles carried in aerosols and droplets by bypassing the mask’s intrinsic filtration system. Before a mask can be deemed to be safe for use in clinical practice by an individual, a fit test is undertaken.[8,9] Two types of fit test are available.[12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call