Abstract

Abstract. In the framework of the EU-FP7 BACCHUS (impact of Biogenic versus Anthropogenic emissions on Clouds and Climate: towards a Holistic UnderStanding) project, an intensive field campaign was performed in Cyprus (March 2015). Remotely piloted aircraft system (RPAS), ground-based instruments, and remote-sensing observations were operating in parallel to provide an integrated characterization of aerosol–cloud interactions. Remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) were equipped with a five-hole probe, pyranometers, pressure, temperature and humidity sensors, and measured vertical wind at cloud base and cloud optical properties of a stratocumulus layer. Ground-based measurements of dry aerosol size distributions and cloud condensation nuclei spectra, and RPA observations of updraft and meteorological state parameters are used here to initialize an aerosol–cloud parcel model (ACPM) and compare the in situ observations of cloud optical properties measured by the RPA to those simulated in the ACPM. Two different cases are studied with the ACPM, including an adiabatic case and an entrainment case, in which the in-cloud temperature profile from RPA is taken into account. Adiabatic ACPM simulation yields cloud droplet number concentrations at cloud base (approximately 400 cm−3) that are similar to those derived from a Hoppel minimum analysis. Cloud optical properties have been inferred using the transmitted fraction of shortwave radiation profile measured by downwelling and upwelling pyranometers mounted on a RPA, and the observed transmitted fraction of solar radiation is then compared to simulations from the ACPM. ACPM simulations and RPA observations shows better agreement when associated with entrainment compared to that of an adiabatic case. The mean difference between observed and adiabatic profiles of transmitted fraction of solar radiation is 0.12, while this difference is only 0.03 between observed and entrainment profiles. A sensitivity calculation is then conducted to quantify the relative impacts of 2-fold changes in aerosol concentration, and updraft to highlight the importance of accounting for the impact of entrainment in deriving cloud optical properties, as well as the ability of RPAs to leverage ground-based observations for studying aerosol–cloud interactions.

Highlights

  • The influence of aerosol–cloud interactions on the climate is through the first indirect aerosol effect (Twomey, 1974), the second indirect aerosol effect (Albrecht, 1989), and other effects of aerosols on cloud

  • This study focuses on an aerosol–cloud closure between in-cloud observations of downwelling solar irradiance from Remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) and results of an aerosol–cloud parcel model (ACPM) initialized with RPA and ground-based measurements

  • Groundbased measurements at Cyprus Atmospheric Observatory are combined with RPA observations to initiate an ACPM to compare observed and simulated cloud optical properties

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The influence of aerosol–cloud interactions on the climate is through the first indirect aerosol effect (Twomey, 1974), the second indirect aerosol effect (Albrecht, 1989), and other effects of aerosols on cloud (a comprehensive review is given in Lohmann and Feichter, 2005). For a highly polluted environment (ICARTT, Detroit, Michigan, Cleveland, Ohio, 2004), Fountoukis et al (2007) achieved a closure within 10 % on average These studies highlight that cloud droplet number concentrations are more sensitive to aerosol and updraft velocity depending on atmospheric conditions. Nant et al (2004) and Meskhidze et al (2005), the impact of entrainment was observed; the data were screened and only on the case studies approximating adiabatic values were used to show aerosol–cloud closure of cloud droplet number concentrations near cloud base. The last section highlights the closure on cloud optical properties with a sensitivity study that compares adiabatic profiles from ACPM simulations and the entrainment parameterization

Cyprus case study
Ground-based observations
Particle size distribution
RPAS observations
Case study: stratocumulus layer
RPA vertical profiles
Aerosol–cloud parcel model
Description of the ACPM
Model inputs from ground measurements and RPAs
Aerosol–CCN comparison through the hygroscopicity parameter
Optical cloud closure study
Cloud droplet number concentration
Cloud optical properties
Sensitivity study on cloud optical properties
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call