Abstract

This paper proposes a methodology to harvest the benefits of camber morphing airfoils for small unmanned aerial vehicle (SUAV) applications. Camber morphing using discrete elements was used to morph the base airfoil, which was split into two, three, and four elements, respectively, to achieve new configurations, into the target one. . In total, thirty morphed airfoil configurations were generated and tested for aerodynamic efficiency at the Reynolds numbers of 2.5 × 105 and 4.8 × 105, corresponding to loiter and cruise Reynolds numbers of a typical SUAV. The target airfoil performance could be closely achieved by combinations of 5 to 8 morphed configurations, the best of which were selected from a pool of thirty morphed airfoil configurations for the typical design specifications of SUAV. Interestingly, some morphed airfoil configurations show a reduction in drag coefficient of 1.21 to 15.17% compared to the target airfoil over a range of flight altitudes for cruise and loiter phases. Inspired by the drag reductions observed, a case study is presented for resizing a SUAV accounting for the mass addition due to the morphing system retaining the benefits of drag reduction.

Highlights

  • Research in the area of morphing is gaining a lot of attention in the aerospace domain (Barbarino et al 2011; Vasista et al 2012; Friswell 2014)

  • This paper explores ways to morph an airfoil through discrete element camber morphing methodology and evaluates their performance benefits for typical mission specifications of small unmanned aerial vehicle (SUAV)

  • COMPARISONS OF MORPHED CONFIGURATIONS WITH TARGET AIRFOIL The base airfoil is configured into two, three, and four-element formations to achieve shape morphing of the airfoil

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Research in the area of morphing is gaining a lot of attention in the aerospace domain (Barbarino et al 2011; Vasista et al 2012; Friswell 2014). Thirty morphed airfoil configurations were generated by adjusting the camber-line of the NACA 0012 at multiple locations along the chord The performances of these airfoils were computed in cruise and loiter Reynolds number of a typical SUAV, using XFLR5 (2017). This section details the development of morphed airfoil configurations through discrete element camber morphing concept, and their performance estimation in low Reynolds number flows. Comparison of pressure coefficients. (a) NACA 4415 at 6o AoA; (b) NACA 0021 at 5o AoA

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
A CASE STUDY
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.