Abstract

Tip clearance flow between rotating blades and the stationary casing in high-pressure turbines is very complex and is one of the most important factors influencing turbine performance. The rotor with a winglet-cavity tip is often used as an effective method to improve the loss resulting from the tip clearance flow. In this study, an aerodynamic geometric optimisation of a winglet-cavity tip was carried out in a linear unshrouded high-pressure axial turbine cascade. For the purpose of shaping the efficient winglet geometry of the rotor tip, a novel parameterisation method has been introduced in the optimisation procedure based on the computational fluid dynamics simulation and analysis. The reliability of a commercial computational fluid dynamics code with different turbulence models was first validated by contrasting with the experimental results, and the numerical total pressure loss and flow angle using the Baseline k-omega Model (BSL κ-ω model) shows a better agreement with the test data. Geometric parameterisation of blade tips along the pressure side and suction side was adopted to optimise the tip clearance flow, and an optimal winglet-cavity tip was proven to achieve lower tip leakage mass flow rate and total pressure loss than the flat tip and cavity tip. Compared to the numerical results of flat tip and cavity tip, the optimised winglet-cavity design, with the winglet along the pressure side and suction side, had lower tip leakage mass flow rate and total pressure loss. It offered a 35.7% reduction in the change ratio [Formula: see text]. In addition, the optimised winglet along pressure side and suction side, respectively, by using the parameterisation method was studied for investigating the individual effect of the pressure-side winglet and suction-side winglet on the tip clearance flow. It was found that the suction-side extension of the optimal winglet resulted in a greater reduction of aerodynamic loss and leakage mass flow than the pressure-side extension of the optimal winglet. Moreover, with the analysis based on the tip flow pattern, the numerical results show that the pressure-side winglet reduced the contraction coefficient, and the suction-side winglet reduced the aerodynamic loss effectively by decreasing the driving pressure difference near the blade tips, the leakage flow velocity, and the interaction between the leakage flow and the main flow. Overall, a better aerodynamic performance can be obtained by adopting the pressure-side and suction-side winglet-cavity simultaneously.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.