Aerodynamic Characteristics Analysis of Rectifier Drum of High-Speed Train Environmental Monitoring Devices

Abstract

To study the aerodynamic characteristics of the convex structure of a surface-monitoring device on a high-speed train and to evaluate its impact on the aerodynamic performance of the high-speed train, numerical simulation research was conducted on three different layouts of the monitoring device. The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method was used for the simulation study, and the unsteady compressible NS equation was used as the control equation. Hexagonal grid technology was used to reduce the demand for the grid quantity. The rationality of the grid size and layout was verified through grid independence research. To increase the accuracy of the numerical simulation, the γ-Reθ transition model and improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) method were coupled for the simulation research. The aerodynamic characteristics of the different operation directions and configurations were compared and analyzed. The research results showed that the windward side of the single pantograph detection device experienced positive pressure, and the sideline and leeward sides experienced negative pressure. Increasing the fillet radius of the sideline could appropriately reduce the aerodynamic resistance. When the speed was about 110 m/s, the drag force coefficient of the detection device was 210~410 N, and the lateral force was small, which means that it had little impact on the overall aerodynamic force of the train. According to the results of the unsteady analysis of the layout with a large space, the resistance during forward travel was greater than that during negative travel. The streamlined upwind surface was conducive to reducing the scope of the leeward separation zone and the amplitude of the pressure fluctuation in the leeward zone, and it thus reduced the resistance. For the running trains, a vortex was formed on their leeward surface. The pressure monitoring results showed that the separated airflow had no dominant frequency or energy peak. The possibility of the following train top and other components experiencing resonance damage is low.