Abstract

Wind tunnel measurements of the mean saltation length $L$ and of different proxies of the mean saltation height $H$ in saturated aeolian sand transport indicate that $L$ and $H$ are relatively insensitive to both the wind speed and grain diameter $d$. The latter result is currently unexplained and contradicts the theoretical prediction $L\propto H\propto d$. This prediction is based on the assumption that the characteristic velocity $\sqrt{\tilde gd}$ of bed grains ejected by the splash of an impacting grain controls the average saltation kinematics. Here, we show that a recent analytical saltation model that considers only rebounds of saltating grains, but neglects splash ejection, is consistent with the measurements. The model suggests that the buffer layer of the inner turbulent boundary layer, which connects the viscous sublayer with the log-layer, is partially responsible for the insensitivity of $L$ and $H$ to $d$. In combination, the measurements and model therefore indicate that splash ejection, though important to sustain saltation, does not significantly affect the average saltation kinematics. This finding represents a strong argument against the Ungar and Haff (1987)-scaling and in favor of the Dur\'an et al. (2011)-scaling of the saturated saltation mass flux, with implications for ripple formation on Mars. Furthermore, it supports the recent controversial claim that this flux is insensitive to soil cohesion.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.