Abstract

The growth of the immigrant population in the United States has prompted a recent increase in the number of restrictive immigration policies at the state and local levels. The literature on policy advocacy and social service organizations suggests that these local providers can engage in political activities that challenge the restrictive nature of these contexts. This qualitative study explored how immigrant-serving social service organizations engage in policy advocacy in a state with restrictive, anti-immigrant policies. In-depth interviews with directors of 50 service providers in South Carolina clearly indicate a tension between the need for policy advocacy and the risks associated with engaging in such activities. Fifty percent (50%) of the providers in our sample reported engaging in some form of policy advocacy. However, their policy advocacy activities were often indirect, non-confrontational, and episodic. Most were engaged in coalitions and other forms of indirect advocacy tactics. We discuss implications for the social work profession and recommendations for future research, including the need to further explore the impact of policy advocacy efforts on changing the policy landscape in places that are unwelcoming to immigrants.

Highlights

  • International migration and theories of integrationInternational migration is the movement of people across nation-state borders (Massey et al, 1994)

  • We aim to address two primary questions: Why do some immigrant-serving organizations engage in policy advocacy activities to advance the rights of immigrants in a harsh immigration policy context, while others do not? And, among those who are active in policy advocacy, what types of actions and strategies do they take? Our framework draws on the literature of immigrant integration (Alba & Nee, 2003; Portes & Rumbaut, 2006) and social service providers as policy advocates (Mellinger, 2014b; Mosley, 2012)

  • We explored the policy advocacy involvement of immigrant-serving organizations in South Carolina, a state with restrictive immigration legislation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

International migration and theories of integrationInternational migration (or immigration) is the movement of people across nation-state borders (Massey et al, 1994). Contemporary sociological theories of immigrant integration emphasize that this process unfolds incrementally and at different rates, depending on a range of factors at various levels, whether individual, familial, or institutional (Alba & Nee, 2003; Portes & Zhou, 1993). Contemporary theories of immigrant integration emphasize that this adaptive process is impacted by the structural characteristics of the receiving context—the places where immigrants settle. Factors such as racial discrimination, xenophobia, residential segregation, and the uneven quality of public schools all influence the opportunities for integration that are available to immigrants, and they will look different depending on the national context where they settle. The pace of integration and opportunities for social mobility are more constrained for labor migrants and undocumented immigrants than for those who arrive on work visas to fill professional jobs in the tech sector (Portes & Rumbaut, 2006)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call