Abstract

This paper uses closed-end funds to analyze two commonly used empirical models for estimating the adverse selection component of a firm's bid–ask spread. In contrast to stocks, closed-end funds report their net asset values weekly, all but eliminating uncertainty about their current liquidation values. Estimates of the adverse selection component, however, are large and significant for both the funds and a matched sample of common stocks. This suggests that either adverse selection arises primarily from factors other than current liquidation value or the empirical models are misspecified.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.