Abstract
When civilians rebel against their establishment; the state responds with its security forces, police, and other organs in attempt to quarrel public dissent. In some cases, repressive state response backfires on a given government and puts it in a much worse political position than before. This has been referred to as political jiu-jitsu or backfire by nonviolence scholars. It empirically occurs when nonviolent civilian uprisings meet aggressive state forces that publicly exert physical action against this nonviolent actor. In the most dramatic of cases, repression may trigger a process that dislocates state hegemony by revealing antagonistic relationships between ruler and subject, often leading to general political crises. In this paper a political process model is presented based around discourse theoretic explanatory concepts to help explain how this phenomenon transpires across a variety of historical contexts and communicational eras. The model involves the triggering of discursively rooted mechanisms, public outrage, and viral effects which elucidate the dynamics and theoretical aspects behind repression backfire in a differing method than previous frameworks offered by conflict scholars.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Civic and Political Studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
