Abstract
Academic scholarship has steadily reported unfavourable clinical findings on the sport of boxing, and national medical bodies have issued calls for restrictions on the sport. Yet, the positions taken on boxing by medical bodies have been subject to serious discussions. Beyond the medical and legal writings, there is also literature referring to the social and cultural features of boxing as ethically significant. However, what is missing in the bioethical literature is an understanding of the boxers themselves. This is apart from their brain injuries, the debates about the degenerative brain disease known as chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), and related issues about the disease. This article argues that the lives of boxers, their relationships, their careers, and their futures, also requires its own research, particularly in telling stories about their lives, and those lives and futures which boxing affects. The article uses two approaches. First, to imagine a more enduring “whole of life viewpoint” by using an extended future timeframe. Second, to consider perspectives of a person’s significant others. After reviewing the boxing literature, the article discusses social settings and then explores the hidden social relationships in life after boxing. With these longer time and close relationship viewpoints, three important themes emerge: family and kinship; age, stage and career; and the effects of boxing fatalities. These analyses are used in conjunction with relevant clinical findings which complement the telling of stories to improve medical information, and engages professional and public empathy for people’s experience of illness and difficulties in coping.
Highlights
Academic scholarship has steadily been reporting unfavourable clinical findings on the sport of boxing [1,2,3,4,5,6]
This is apart from their brain injuries [19,20], the debates about the degenerative brain disease known as chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) [21,22,23], and related issues about the disease [24]
This study of the 93-year-old former street boxer advised clinicians to be aware that traumatic brain injury is a risk factor for dementia and that CTE can coincide with other neurodegenerative diseases
Summary
Academic scholarship has steadily been reporting unfavourable clinical findings on the sport of boxing [1,2,3,4,5,6]. This article makes its contribution by examining three areas: the family and kinship relationships of boxers; their age, stage and career aspects; and the effects of the deaths of boxers These are significant community dimensions which need to be highlighted as ethically relevant to consider. Such vantage points have ethical weight, though they are sources which remain mostly “out of view.” Within this longer time and close relationship viewpoints, three important themes emerge: family and kinship; age, stage and career; and the effects of boxing fatalities. These analyses are used in conjunction with relevant clinical findings. Such insights are helpful in enriching ethical deliberations which may otherwise be obscured in philosophical and biomedical debates
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.