Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare drug-eluting stents (DES) with drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in terms of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients who have undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).MethodologyOut of 210 angioplasties in six months, 80 patients were included; 40 in DES and 40 in DCB, respectively. All had a successful PPCI. It was defined as the achievement of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade II/III with <20% residual stenosis for the DES and TIMI grade II/III with <30% residual stenosis for the DCB. Any subsequent MACCE during the ensuing six months were assessed from emergency/outpatient records during their subsequent hospital visits, hospital registry, and telephonic interviews.ResultsThe mean age in the DES group was 54.83 + 8.72 years while it was 56.8 + 8.9 years in the DCB group. The left anterior descending artery (LAD) was the culprit artery in the majority of the cases in both groups. The mean diameter of DES and DCB was 3.17 + 0.38 mm and 2.75 + 0.53 mm, respectively. Overall, 15 adverse events were seen in the DES group and 16 in the DCB group. The difference was insignificant (P-value = ≥ 0.999). There were nine hospitalizations due to chest pain in the DES group and eight in the DCB group. Total vessel revascularization (TVR) was seen in two patients in the DES group and three patients in the DCB group. None of the patients suffered a stroke. All variables of MACCE were non-significant (P-value = ≥ 0.999).ConclusionDCB appears to be non-inferior to DES in PPCI at a median follow-up of six months.

Highlights

  • Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is caused by the occlusion of a coronary artery due to the rupture or erosion of a plaque with thrombus formation [1]

  • Adverse events were seen in the Drugeluting stents (DES) group and in the drug-coated balloons (DCBs) group

  • This was shown in a study that demonstrated an increased incidence of stent thrombosis among AMI patients treated with DES as compared with balloon angioplasty alone, paving a potential role of a DCB in Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) [5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is caused by the occlusion of a coronary artery due to the rupture or erosion of a plaque with thrombus formation [1]. Drugeluting stents (DES) are implanted in the blocked arteries after the restoration of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow during PPCI [3]. Various large trials have proven DES to reduce repeat revascularization, they do not reduce mortality as compared to balloon angioplasty alone and it increases the long-term risk of stent thrombosis and stent restenosis [4,5]. The drug-coated balloon (DCB) has emerged as an alternative treatment option to treat coronary artery stenosis [6]. The presence of drugs with antiproliferative properties helps reduce the potential risk of an inflammatory response to a metal platform seen in cases of stents, reducing the risk of stent restenosis and stent thrombosis [8]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call