Adverse childhood experiences and prenatal depression in the maternal and development risks from environmental and social stressors pregnancy cohort

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the association between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and risk for depression among 480 predominantly low-income Hispanic/Latina women in the Maternal and Development Risks from Environmental and Social Stressors pregnancy cohort. Models were fitted to evaluate associations between ACEs and prenatal probable depression measured by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale adjusting for recruitment site, age, income, race/ethnicity, marital status and parity. The ACEs Questionnaire parameterised experiences as counts (0–10), categories (0, 1–3 and 4+ ACEs) and domains. Participants had a significantly higher likelihood of prenatal probable depression per unit increase in ACEs count or if they reported 4+ ACEs relative to 0 ACEs. Higher likelihood of probable depression was also associated with higher counts of each ACEs domains: abuse, neglect and household dysfunction. Findings suggest systematic screening for depressive symptoms in those with a history of childhood adversities may be important in prenatal care practice. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? Experiencing depression during pregnancy has been associated with later adverse maternal mental and physical health outcomes. Emerging studies indicate that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may maintain or increase the predisposition to prenatal depression. What do the results of this study add? Although prenatal depressive symptoms are prevalent among racial/ethnic minority samples including Hispanic/Latinas, research determining whether the association between ACEs and prenatal depression varies by nativity is scarce. Overall, ACEs were common among Maternal and Developmental Risks from Environmental and Social Stressors (MADRES) participants and were associated with a higher likelihood of probable depression during pregnancy. These patterns did not significantly differ among the foreign-born versus U.S.-born Hispanic/Latina women, although the associations were stronger among U.S.-born Hispanic/Latina women. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Research should continue to focus on the effects of ACEs in communities that have been historically excluded in perinatal mental health services such as pregnant women from racial and ethnic minority groups. It may be important for clinicians to routinely screen for mental health during pregnancy as an adverse, psychological environment may impact both women and children. These findings suggest a need for improvement in systematic screening for depressive symptoms in those with a history of childhood adversities.