Adversary Evaluation of An MPA Program

Abstract

This study describes an adversary evaluation of a graduate program in public administration using a combination of judicial and debate techniques. Results showed that the program lacked (a) course integration, (b) certain necessary courses, (c) adequate definition of management skills, and (d) sufficient hands-on training. However, evidence was persuasive that certain needs of students are met through individualization. This adversary evaluation produced useful information and stimulated involvement and communication. Potentials and limitations of adversary evaluation, particularly in light of higher education's political and organizational dynamics, are discussed.