Abstract
ABSTRACT:This study uses a mix of qualitative, quantitative, and spatial statistical methods to investigate local government responses to a state level change in land use policy. The results suggest that local governments resisted state intervention, and were guided mainly by self-interest and peers’ actions when deciding whether or not to change their ordinances. The study examines the reasons for this principal–agent failure, and suggests an alternative approach for other weak-mandate states attempting to influence local land use policy.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
