Abstract
In Star Trek: The Making Of The TV Series (1968) Gene Roddenberry describes his difficulties in getting the NBC network to back the concept of a science fiction show that would reflect his vision of a utopian, egalitarian future. SF was largely thought of by TV programmers as low-budget ‘kids stuff’. The most successful SF show before Star Trek had been Captain Video and His Video Rangers, an extremely juvenile drama with very simplistic ‘black and white’ morality and unexplained science which ran for six years between 1948 and 1954. This series established SF TV as a children’s medium, and was followed by similar productions as Tom Corbett, Space Cadet (1950–2), Buck Rogers (1950–1), Johnny Jupiter (1953–4) and The Adventures of Superman (1951–7). More recent adult-orientated SF shows such as The Twilight Zone (1959–64) and The Outer Limits (1963–5) had achieved some success, but these series were anthologies of different stories. The idea of launching a more ‘serious’ SF show with regularly recurring characters was thought to be both a risky and an expensive one, and Roddenberry’s insistence that his cast would include at least one alien character as a regular member of the Starship crew seemed to some network executives to be a recipe for disaster.KeywordsOriginal SeriesPrime DirectiveTwilight ZoneStar TrekNetwork ExecutiveThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.