Abstract

Angiogenesis plays a crucial role in tumor development and metastasis. Both bevacizumab and cediranib have demonstrated activity as single anti-angiogenic agents in endometrial cancer, though subsequent studies of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy failed to improve outcomes compared to chemotherapy alone. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of cediranib and bevacizumab in endometrial cancer models. The cellular effects of bevacizumab and cediranib were examined in endometrial cancer cell lines using extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) phosphorylation, ligand shedding, cell viability, and cell cycle progression as readouts. Cellular viability was also tested in eight patient-derived organoid models of endometrial cancer. Finally, we performed a phosphoproteomic array of 875 phosphoproteins to define the signaling changes related to bevacizumab versus cediranib. Cediranib but not bevacizumab blocked ligand-mediated ERK activation in endometrial cancer cells. In both cell lines and patient-derived organoids, neither bevacizumab nor cediranib alone had a notable effect on cell viability. Cediranib but not bevacizumab promoted marked cell death when combined with chemotherapy. Cell cycle analysis demonstrated an accumulation in mitosis after treatment with cediranib + chemotherapy, consistent with the abrogation of the G2/M checkpoint and subsequent mitotic catastrophe. Molecular analysis of key controllers of the G2/M cell cycle checkpoint confirmed its abrogation. Phosphoproteomic analysis revealed that bevacizumab and cediranib had both similar and unique effects on cell signaling that underlie their shared versus individual actions as anti-angiogenic agents. An anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor such as cediranib has the potential to be superior to bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy.

Highlights

  • IntroductionEndometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United

  • The standard of care for endometrial cancer has not changed beyond chemotherapy, the incidence is on the rise due to the obesity epidemic, and outcomes are worse than in the 1970s

  • The data presented in this report are designed to identify agents that should be advanced into clinical trials to improve outcomes for women with endometrial cancer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United. In 2020, over 65,000 women were diagnosed with endometrial cancer and nearly. 13,000 women died of this disease [1]. The five-year survival rate of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer is relatively high, patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer have a poor prognosis. Population studies have shown that endometrial adenocarcinoma is one of the only cancers in which prevalence and Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 682.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call