Abstract

Superficial temporal artery (STA) to superior cerebellar artery (SCA) bypass is usually performed via the subtemporal approach (StA), anterior transpetrosal approach (ApA), or combined petrosal approach (CpA), but no study has yet reported a quantitative comparison of the operative field size provided by each approach, and the optimal approach is unclear. The objective of this study is to establish evidence for selecting the approach by using cadaver heads to measure the three-dimensional distances that represent the operative field size for STA–SCA bypass. Ten sides of 10 cadaver heads were used to perform the four approaches: StA, ApA with and without zygomatic arch osteotomy (ApA-ZO− and ApA-ZO+), and CpA. For each approach, the major-axis length and the minor-axis length at the anastomosis site (La-A and Li-A), the major-axis length and the minor-axis length at the brain surface (La-B and Li-B), the depth from the brain surface to the anastomosis site (Dp), and the operating angles of the major axis and the minor axis (OAa and OAi) were measured. Shallower Dp and wider operating angle were obtained in the order CpA, ApA-ZO+, ApA-ZO−, and StA. In all parameters, ApA-ZO− extended the operative field more than StA. ApA-ZO+ extended La-B and OAa more than ApA-ZO−, whereas it did not contribute to Dp and OAi. CpA significantly decreased Dp, and widened OAa and OAi more than ApA-ZO+. ApA and CpA greatly expanded the operative field compared with StA. These results provide criteria for selecting the optimal approach for STA-SCA bypass in light of an individual surgeon’s anastomosis skill level.

Highlights

  • Superficial temporal artery (STA) to superior cerebellar artery (SCA) bypass is known to be effective for revascularization in steno-occlusive disease of the posterior circulation [2, 3, 5, 8, 10, 11, 16, 22, 27]

  • The size of the operative field for the STA–SCA bypass via four different approaches was measured using cadaver heads, and it was found that shallower Dp and a wider operating angle were obtained in the order combined petrosal approach (CpA), ApA-ZO+, ApA-ZO−, and subtemporal approach (StA)

  • A comparison between the StA and the ApA-ZO− showed that the ApA-ZO− greatly expanded the operative field compared with that provided by the StA, and a comparison between the ApA-ZO− and the ApA-ZO+ showed that zygomatic arch osteotomy contributed to a widened OAa, whereas it did not contribute to Dp, OAi, and the minor-axis length, such as Li-A and Li-B

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Superficial temporal artery (STA) to superior cerebellar artery (SCA) bypass is known to be effective for revascularization in steno-occlusive disease of the posterior circulation [2, 3, 5, 8, 10, 11, 16, 22, 27]. This procedure is required when an aneurysm in the posterior circulation is treated using a flow alteration technique that requires trapping [13, 14, 18, 23]. Neurosurgical Review for the choice of approach by using cadaver heads to measure the three-dimensional distances that represent the size of the operative field for STA–SCA bypass.

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call