Advantages and limitations of a new cationic coating inducing a slow electroosmotic flow for CE-MS peptide analysis: a comparative study with commercial coatings

Abstract

Capillary coatings are crucial for high-quality separation performance in capillary electrophoresis analysis of proteins or peptides as they prevent analyte adsorption at the capillary wall. These coating materials have to fulfill many requirements such as a good separation performance and ensuring a good repeatability. The number of commercially available coating materials is still limited, especially with regard to the charge density on the coating material and the induced electroosmotic flow (EOF) velocity. In this work, we compare the separation performance of the novel self-made cationic capillary coating OHNOON and two commercially available coating materials, the acrylamide based, neutral LN® and the cationic hexadimethrine bromide (Polybrene), using the same coating procedure for all three coating materials. The coatings are investigated regarding the separation efficiency, analyte resolution, coating stability, and migration time stability in tryptic peptide analysis. Good separation performance was confirmed for all three coating materials: all coatings provided high plate numbers of up to 400,000-500,000 and a repeatability of the EOF and the analyte migration times in the range of 1% relative standard deviation or below. Our results reveal a moderate EOF velocity for the novel OHNOON coating in comparison to the Polybrene coating. We present a detailed discussion of the impact of this reduced EOF velocity and the separation performance. The results presented here will help to define the necessary properties of coating materials to achieve the best compromise between speed of analysis and resolution for the respective application. We show that our novel OHNOON coating is especially valuable for the analysis of low mobility analytes and for samples with a broad range of analyte mobilities.