Abstract
Ischemic preconditioning (IP) and intermittent inflow occlusion (IO) have provided beneficial outcomes in hepatic resection. However, comparison of these two procedures against warm hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury has not been studied enough. Pigs that had undergone 65% hepatectomy were subjected to Control (120 min continuous ischemia, n = 6), IP (10 min ischemia and 10 min reperfusion, followed by 120 min continuous ischemia, n = 6), and IO (120 min ischemia in the form of eight successive periods of 15 min ischemia and 5 min reperfusion, n = 6). We evaluated hepatocyte injury by aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase and hepaplastin test, hepatic microcirculation by hepatic tissue blood flow (HTBF) and endothelin (ET)-1, inflammatory response by tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and histopathology after reperfusion. IP prevented hepatocyte injury, HTBF disturbance, and hepatocyte necrosis in histopathology as well as IO. These two groups showed significantly better outcomes than Control. IP produced significantly less ET-1 and TNF-alpha than IO. IP ameliorated hepatic warm ischemia-reperfusion injury. Furthermore, IP gained more advantages in preventing chemokine production such as ET-1 and inflammatory response over IO. IP could take the place of IO for hepatectomy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
