Abstract
In our recent Opinion [1], we called for better recognition of the contributions of quantitative geography in conservation science. In this light, we are pleased that da Silva and Bueno [2] have engaged in discussion with our ideas. da Silva and Bueno [2] echo the exciting prospect of establishing and developing a research area dedicated to conservation geography but also raise relevant questions in response to our Opinion. Their main argumentation relates to the potential overlap between quantitative conservation geography and conservation biogeography and to the inclusion of mixed and qualitative methods to broaden the scope of conservation geography.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
