Abstract

Although advancements in remote sensing technology have facilitated quick capture and identification of the source and location of oil spills in water bodies, the presence of other biogenic elements (lookalikes) with similar visual attributes hinder rapid detection and prompt decision making for emergency response. To date, different methods have been applied to distinguish oil spills from lookalikes with limited success. In addition, accurately modeling the trajectory of oil spills remains a challenge. Thus, we aim to provide further insights on the multi-faceted problem by undertaking a holistic review of past and current approaches to marine oil spill disaster reduction as well as explore the potentials of emerging digital trends in minimizing oil spill hazards. The scope of previous reviews is extended by covering the inter-related dimensions of detection, discrimination, and trajectory prediction of oil spills for vulnerability assessment. Findings show that both optical and microwave airborne and satellite remote sensors are used for oil spill monitoring with microwave sensors being more widely used due to their ability to operate under any weather condition. However, the accuracy of both sensors is affected by the presence of biogenic elements, leading to false positive depiction of oil spills. Statistical image segmentation has been widely used to discriminate lookalikes from oil spills with varying levels of accuracy but the emergence of digitalization technologies in the fourth industrial revolution (IR 4.0) is enabling the use of Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models, which are more promising than the statistical methods. The Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) are the most used machine learning algorithms for oil spill detection, although the restriction of ML models to feed forward image classification without support for the end-to-end trainable framework limits its accuracy. On the other hand, deep learning models’ strong feature extraction and autonomous learning capability enhance their detection accuracy. Also, mathematical models based on lagrangian method have improved oil spill trajectory prediction with higher real time accuracy than the conventional worst case, average and survey-based approaches. However, these newer models are unable to quantify oil droplets and uncertainty in vulnerability prediction. Considering that there is yet no single best remote sensing technique for unambiguous detection and discrimination of oil spills and lookalikes, it is imperative to advance research in the field in order to improve existing technology and develop specialized sensors for accurate oil spill detection and enhanced classification, leveraging emerging geospatial computer vision initiatives.

Highlights

  • Oil spills are a global phenomenon that have been increasing with the rise in oil consumption [1]

  • This review evaluates various remote sensing technologies that are used for the identification of oil spills in the marine environment

  • The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the opportunities and challenges of RS, Machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) in oil spill management in addition to trajectory prediction models

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Oil spills are a global phenomenon that have been increasing with the rise in oil consumption [1]. Accidents arising from system failure, vandalism, human error [4], shipwreck, and collision are the major causes of oil spills. These result in severe ecological and economic disasters [5] which are exemplified by the cost of crude oil loss, cleaning costs, impact research funding, and rehabilitation costs. Lynch [6] reported the loss of 4.9 million barrels of crude oil and $68 billion incurred for environmental cleaning after the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill at the Gulf of Mexico. Loss of marine mammals and vegetation have been reported [18,19,20] The severity of these hazards is aggravated by the slow response to oil spill disasters. Rapid response to oil spills prevents indiscriminate spread and minimizes likely consequences [21,22,23,24]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call