Abstract
Several of the finest unclaimed prizes in directed graph theory involve the packing of directed joins. One difficulty in claiming these prizes is that the broad conjecture posed by Edmonds and Giles, whether the maximum number of disjoint directed joins equals the smallest weight of a directed cut in every weighted directed graph, is not true in general. This is despite the fact that the conjecture is true in several special cases, and is also true if the roles of directed joins and directed cuts are reversed. Another difficulty is that the known minimal counterexamples, one found by Schrijver and two found by Cornuejols and Guenin during a computer search, are mysterious in nature. We dispel some of this mystery by providing a framework for understanding the known counterexamples. We then use this framework to construct several new counterexamples, and to prove that every “smallest” minimal counterexample has now been found. Finally, we temper these advances by introducing an NP-completeness result for a more difficult problem.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.