Abstract

Advances in neuromotor stroke rehabilitation.

Highlights

  • Despite the extraordinary possibilities of these new approaches, there is a lot of work for integrating them into the routinary rehabilitation programs. These devices should be considered as tools in the hands of neurorehabilitation teams usable in the framework of a rehabilitative program and rehabilitative per se. They should be integrated in a complex model in which the aim and the actual patients conditions concur to tailor training with multimodal conditions integrating classical and well-known conventional therapy with the new approaches, including new technological devices [4]

  • The efficacy of the robotic training in arm and walking neurorehabilitation after stroke has been proven in several trials; the debate has still been open and there is no possibility at the moment to perform only machine aided training [5]

  • Masiero et al analyzed the costs of the 5 years experiments on arm robotic training in hospital setting in subacute stroke, reaching this conclusion “Robotic upper limb rehabilitation after acute stroke by NeReBot: evaluation of treatment costs.”

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The efficacy of the robotic training in arm and walking neurorehabilitation after stroke has been proven in several trials; the debate has still been open and there is no possibility at the moment to perform only machine aided training [5]. A big amount of economic resources, needed for the rehabilitation of people after stroke, is related to the increasing prevalence of patients affected by stroke sequelae.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call