Abstract

This paper evaluates the machine learning-based weather-related crash prediction model in Connecticut. Crash severity prediction has always been the principal focus of safety professionals and emergency responders for appropriate policy making and resource management. Over the years, different statistical methodologies (e.g., random forest, support vector machine) have been explored in various research efforts to develop efficient crash severity prediction models. As technology is advancing and computing has started becoming more efficient, machine learning-based models for crash severity prediction are being brought into light for more accurate data-driven prediction. However, some machine learning methodologies provide increased efficiency and better performance compared to others from the same genre. To explore different machine learning methodologies for crash severity prediction, this study considered two machine learning applications—random forest (RF) and bayesian additive regression trees (BART) for performance comparison. RF model produced higher prediction probabilities for determining crash severity compare to BART. The results were evaluated using various prediction probability analyses obtained from these two machine learning models and showed the model capabilities to generate prediction consistent with the observed data. We found the performance of the RF model to be highly promising with a higher skill score (0.73) than BART (0.61). Overall, our findings demonstrate the robust performances of the RF algorithm in predicting weather-related crashes. The analysis of this study confirms that stakeholders can use weather-related RF model with confidence to obtain a better prediction of crash severity that enables them to facilitate appropriate emergency responses and support essential preemptive measures.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call