Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumours (nets) are classified by site of origin, with lung being the second most common primary site after the gastrointestinal tract. Lung nets are rare and heterogeneous, with varied pathologic and clinical features. Typical and atypical carcinoid tumours are low-grade lung nets which, compared with the more common high-grade nets, are associated with a more favourable prognosis. Still, optimal treatment strategies are lacking. This review concentrates on classification and treatment strategies for metastatic low-grade lung nets, considering both typical and atypical carcinoids. The terminology can be confusing, and an attempt is made to simplify it. Promising results from recent trials that included lung nets are presented and discussed. Finally, guidelines from Europe and North America are discussed, and differences are noted. Even within the group of patients with low-grade nets, the presentation, the locations of metastasis, and the speed of progression can be very different. The initial work-up and an understanding of the tumour's biology are key in making management decisions. Various treatment options-including somatostatin analogs, peptide receptor radioligand therapy, and biologic systemic therapy, specifically with the mtor (mechanistic target of rapamycin) inhibitor everolimus-are now available and are presented in a treatment algorithm. Although lung nets are rare and evidence supporting optimal treatment strategies is lacking, the recent publication of trials that have included patients with lung nets advances evidence-based therapy for these tumours. Many variables have to be considered in managing these tumours that have received little attention. Education for treating physicians is needed.

Highlights

  • Breast cancer has overtaken lung cancer as the most commonly diagnosed cancer globally in 2020 [1]

  • Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) clustering was used to classify them into two groups named HAM1 and HAM2 (Figure 2)

  • Various patterns of expression were noticed for the eight genes which suggest that the histone acetylation modulators (HAMs) groups could be very different from the PAM50 intrinsic subtypes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Breast cancer has overtaken lung cancer as the most commonly diagnosed cancer globally in 2020 [1]. Breast cancer is widely accepted as a highly heterogeneous disease. The current approach to classifying breast cancer into clinical subtypes is based on the immunohistochemistry (IHC) results of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and proliferation marker Ki67. This IHC based clinical subtyping system is not ideal, and gene expression profiling (intrinsic subtyping) reveals a deeper appreciation for the disease heterogeneity [2]. In 2000, Perou et al developed the PAM50 intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer based on a set of 50 genes [3]. Various other tests based on gene expression quantification have been developed to provide molecular stratification of breast cancer [4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call